Anyone know if it is legal in GA for a civilian with a GWL to carry AP rounds such as the FNH SS190 in a FN 5.7? Was thinking of buying some of these.
Another referenceCurrently there are eleven states that have barred the sale or possession of armor-piercing bullets: Alabama, California, Connecticut, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas.
It’s perfectly legal to possess, purchase, sell or shoot armor piercing ammunition. It’s not legal to manufacture or import armor piercing ammunition
ATF has expressly ruled that SS109/M855 bullets are not covered.
The bullet must either have a core made ENTIRELY out of one or more of the listed metals, or be a full jacketed type bullet with a jacket comprising more that 25% of its weight. Thus SS109/M855 .223 (5.56mm) bullets would not be covered, because their core is only partly steel, and partly lead. Lead is not a listed metal, and bullets with cores made partly out of lead are OK.
Question is where do you find the 190 round? or any 5.7 right now?500mag said:Thanks, guys. It appears it is legal in GA to carry 5.7 x 28 SS190 AP then. Any criminal can now go on Ebay and buy a kevlar vest.....
My other question is why would you want to carry an AP rounds for your normal every day self defense gun?slammy said:Question is where do you find the 190 round? or any 5.7 right now?500mag said:Thanks, guys. It appears it is legal in GA to carry 5.7 x 28 SS190 AP then. Any criminal can now go on Ebay and buy a kevlar vest.....
I can not speak for the OP, but for myself muggers are not the only group people I am trying to defend myself against.Archangel said:My other question is why would you want to carry an AP rounds for your normal every day self defense gun?
My opinion (for what it's worth) is that it would be too over penetrative for me to carry as every day ammo.
Your chances of running into a mugger wearing body armor are about as likely as getting struck by lightning.
Your chances of shooting through a goblin and hitting the old lady or kid behind them in the parking lot/store/etc are a lot more likely....
Just my two cents.
I'll second that. You're unlikely to encounter a self-defense situation that requires discharging you firearm, but if you do, the odds are that your target will not have body armor. Even if they do, discharging several rounds into their torso is going to hurt and likely produce a stunned reflex, getting you a chance to get to cover. I'd be more concerned about over-penetration as an SD shooting outside the home can happen in an environment where there are citizens that would make easy collateral damage from a round that over penetrates. An SD shooting isn't likely to afford you too much time to think about and adjust your backstop behind your target - especially for your initial shots.Archangel said:My other question is why would you want to carry an AP rounds for your normal every day self defense gun?
My opinion (for what it's worth) is that it would be too over penetrative for me to carry as every day ammo.
Your chances of running into a mugger wearing body armor are about as likely as getting struck by lightning.
Your chances of shooting through a goblin and hitting the old lady or kid behind them in the parking lot/store/etc are a lot more likely....
Just my two cents.
Correct, but just b/c something is and should be legal does not mean it's smart.CoffeeMate said:AP rounds are fun. "...shall not be infringed..." doesn't require a reason.
So you are saying that you want this kindd of ammo so that it can go through police body armmor and kills cops? You shoud be ashamed of yourslef, I sure as hell dont support that at all and you ain't doing nobody no favors in the citizen gun community.XD9SC said:I can not speak for the OP, but for myself muggers are not the only group people I am trying to defend myself against.Archangel said:My other question is why would you want to carry an AP rounds for your normal every day self defense gun?
My opinion (for what it's worth) is that it would be too over penetrative for me to carry as every day ammo.
Your chances of running into a mugger wearing body armor are about as likely as getting struck by lightning.
Your chances of shooting through a goblin and hitting the old lady or kid behind them in the parking lot/store/etc are a lot more likely....
Just my two cents.
There is another group who almost always wears body armor and has a history of assaulting peaceful individuals who have not harmed another person or there property.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cases_of_police_brutality_in_the_United_States
Your comments about over penetration is a very real concern and would be wise to be in integrated into an individuals training and tactics.
Not sure what you're arguing here?CoffeeMate said:"... OMG! a fire extingusher! ... you could bash someone's head in with that!anic: ..."
Thank you for saving me the keystrokes.AtlPhilip said:I expect that if you find yourself before a jury judging arguing the lawfulness of shooting an officer, going into the conflict with AP rounds in your EDC is going to put some barbed wire atop that already very high burden of proof.
Welcome to the club. Get used to it, there are always a "variety of opinions" here. Stick around and you'll find that the majority are pretty reasonable.Krusteaz said:So you are saying that you want this kindd of ammo so that it can go through police body armmor and kills cops? You shoud be ashamed of yourslef, I sure as hell dont support that at all and you ain't doing nobody no favors in the citizen gun community.
WTF is up with this place anyway? I thought this was about peacfull folks carrying legal guns in a legal fashion for self defense, not plotting on what is the best ammo to use to kill cops. No wondr most Amercians don't supprt this kind of crap thnking, nothin but trouble here and aint nothing good gonna come of it ever. Hell this is just another reason why cops need to be better armed and shoot first. Now tht I read this crap about carrying ammo that can go thru vests to use against cops, cant say I would shed any tears if the cops took you out first.
Here is my 2 cents: This kind of talk is am embarrasment to every law abidin gun owner in my opinion. You make us all lookk bad.
dcannon1 said:No one is saying AP rounds should be illegal at all.
[/quote:2o0jx5ui]GeorgiaShooter said:http://gun.laws.com/ammunition/ammuniti ... ammunition
Another referenceCurrently there are eleven states that have barred the sale or possession of armor-piercing bullets: Alabama, California, Connecticut, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas.
http://www.pagunblog.com/2007/07/29/arm ... cing-ammo/
[quote:2o0jx5ui]It’s perfectly legal to possess, purchase, sell or shoot armor piercing ammunition. It’s not legal to manufacture or import armor piercing ammunition
For the most part it is.Krusteaz said:WTF is up with this place anyway? I thought this was about peacfull folks carrying legal guns in a legal fashion for self defense...
Who is plotting?Krusteaz said:...not plotting on what is the best ammo to use to kill cops.
Keeps 'em distracted.GeorgiaShooter said:One way to really piss off the HOA![]()
CoffeeMate hit the nail on the head.Krusteaz said:So you are saying that you want this kindd of ammo so that it can go through police body armmor and kills cops? You shoud be ashamed of yourslef, I sure as hell dont support that at all and you ain't doing nobody no favors in the citizen gun community.
CoffeeMate said:Who is plotting? In my mind, the "root cause" is letting someone fallaciously couch the discussion in terms of "...the only reason for AP rounds is to kill cops..."
I'm not saying that it shouldn't be LEGAL, or infringed, I was genuinely curious....CoffeeMate said:AP rounds are fun. "...shall not be infringed..." doesn't require a reason.
This. :righton:dcannon1 said:No one is saying AP rounds should be illegal at all. Most are just saying carrying them in your EDC is probably not the smartest thing to do due to over penetration and lack of effectiveness in most SD situations.