Wrenn v. DC

Discussion in 'National Laws, Bills and Politics' started by tmoore912, May 18, 2015.

  1. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    SAF WINS PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN CHALLENGE TO NEW DC GUN LAW


    http://www.saf.org/?p=6169

    The case, Wrenn et al v. District of Columbia et al, was a follow-on case to Palmer v. District of Columbia and was filed after the DC City Council adopted their new carry regulations.


    SAF @2AFDN 25 minutes ago
    SAF wins preliminary injunction in challenge to new DC gun carry ban #2A #RKBA #GunRights http://www.saf.org/?p=6169
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2015
  2. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    Dave Kopel @davekopel · 2h 2 hours ago
    Fed.Ct. issues prelim. inj. against DC statute denying carry permits to almost everyone. Huge win for @alangura.
     

  3. Nemo

    Nemo Man of Myth and Legend

    12,830
    827
    113
    :righton: SAF & Gura

    Nemo
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2015
  4. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    D.C. weighing appeal of court ruling that loosens gun control law

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...f733c4-fe2c-11e4-805c-c3f407e5a9e9_story.html

     
  5. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    D.C. just got b*t*h slapped by Judge Scullin again!


    John Richardson ‏@jpr9954 7 minutes ago
    District Of Columbia Doesn't Get Its Stay http://dlvr.it/B0tVSH



    Federal Judge Denies DC’s Request to Immediately Stay Gun Ruling
    Hearing on long-term stay scheduled for July 7


    http://freebeacon.com/issues/federal-judge-denies-dcs-request-to-immediately-stay-gun-ruling/

     
  6. Taurus92

    Taurus92 Well-Known Member

    9,458
    112
    63
  7. Gunstar1

    Gunstar1 Administrator

    8,460
    5
    38
    SAF Seeks Contempt Against District Of Columbia For Stall In Wrenn CCW Case
    http://www.saf.org/?p=6233
     
  8. CoffeeMate

    CoffeeMate Junior Butt Warmer

    46,427
    9
    0
    Time for Congress to rescind the District Charter and try again.
     
  9. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    Circuit Court Issues Stay on Lower Court’s D.C. Gun Carry Ruling

    Stay allows controversial ‘good reason’ clause to go back into effect

    http://freebeacon.com/issues/circuit-court-issues-stay-on-lower-courts-d-c-gun-carry-ruling/

     
  10. Taurus92

    Taurus92 Well-Known Member

    9,458
    112
    63
    Maybe if government gets too overbearing, government will allow the people to have arms? Is that really what they think the 2A meant? They seem to want to rule out everything else.
     
  11. Gunstar1

    Gunstar1 Administrator

    8,460
    5
    38
    No, they think it means they can ban guns. However a judge had said no, you must allow carry, so they went for this other way to not allow carry.
     
  12. codegeek

    codegeek codegeek reincarnate

    901
    9
    18
    They pass gun control laws. We say the laws are unconstitutional. The judge says no it doesn't infringe the second amendment, and there are no repercussions.
     
  13. Phil1979

    Phil1979 Member Georgia Carry

    11,494
    599
    113
    When infringements are called non-infringements words lose their meaning. As a result "freedoms" are not really freedoms.

    This is just the way that the government maintains and increases its power over its subjects. If the subjects complain, all the government needs to do is to just point to the Constitution and say, "Silly people, see, here are your freedoms." But of course, "freedoms" has already been redefined.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2015
  14. Marine6212

    Marine6212 Active Member

    1,142
    16
    38
    That's why I believe every judge should be elected not appointed!
     
  15. SimbaLion

    SimbaLion Banned

    557
    0
    16
    The 2nd amendment was written to prevent every ****ing state from having it's own personal gun rights lawsuit to lose. And yet these retards in government have forced the stupid fight down our throats for the last 40-50 years anyway.

    Sometimes I wish hell was real because every one of them deserves to go there forever. Glad to see D.C. has to pay for it's violations. Is carry there actually legal now? or is it restricted behind 'good reason' bull*****?

    (I mean legal according to city laws, since it is obviously legal because of the 2nd amendment, and anyone who thinks differently is a traitor.)
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2015
  16. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    It's legal now with a permit. It's "May Issue" (Good Cause) with lots of infringements/hoops to jump thru. There has only been less than 50 permits issued iirc.
     
  17. Phil1979

    Phil1979 Member Georgia Carry

    11,494
    599
    113
  18. CoffeeMate

    CoffeeMate Junior Butt Warmer

    46,427
    9
    0
    "...and so, it keeps on grinding along..."
     
  19. tmoore912

    tmoore912 Just a Man

    6,031
    160
    63
    D.C. gun case gets new judge after appeals court ruling http://wtop.com/dc/2016/02/d-c-gun-case-gets-new-judge-after-appeals-court-ruling/