Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner
1 - 3 of 38 Posts

· Registered
3,710 Posts
From a legal perspective, is the cop's unjustified INTENTIONAL use of force (the dog) against a real offender in the street (the bicyclist)

even RELEVANT for the new incident involving an ACCIDENT, where the cop grabbed a gun that he thought would not fire.
Not legally relevant, but it goes a long way in explaining how it could possibly happen. Other people's welfare is of no concern to this guy apparently. It's easier for him to let the dog chew the bicyclist up than to wrestle the guy. Sooner or later the guy will stop moving because of death, blood loss or shock and he wont have to wrestle with him.

It wasn't important enough for him to check the weapon to see if it was unloaded. He didn't care enough to check. What consequences are there for him anyway? Its just an accident. No skin off his ass. He probably didn't even have to help clean up the mess.
1 - 3 of 38 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.