Joined
·
703 Posts
This is on the wire from AP and Fox News. Washington D.C. has decided to take the results of the appeals court decision to the Supreme Court. Keep a close eye on this one!
Yeah. :lol: We have been doing that since it was in the District Court and the NRA was trying to kill it.Warrenton NO CCW said:Keep a close eye on this one!
:lol:kkennett said:What is more disturbing is that D.C. has hired Thomas Goldstein of Akin Gump to do the appeal. He is one very fine S Ct. lawyer and will give this thing the very best chance possible for D.C. Too bad the city attorneys didn't decide to just do it themselves.
The next time city bitches about not having enough money to hire more LEOs, someone should point out how much they have spent on an outside counsel to take this appeal when they had a full staff in house.kkennett said:D.C. has begun their filings by requesting a 30 day extension of the time to file its cert. application, which would normally be due Aug. 6. The respondents will oppose and the application for extension goes to the Chief J. These things aren't typically granted, but this one may be.
What is more disturbing is that D.C. has hired Thomas Goldstein of Akin Gump to do the appeal. He is one very fine S Ct. lawyer and will give this thing the very best chance possible for D.C. Too bad the city attorneys didn't decide to just do it themselves.
[D.C. Attorney General Linda] Singer said she will receive pro bono legal assistance from several high-profile constitutional law experts, including former acting solicitor general Walter E. Dellinger III. She called the city's handgun laws "reasonable" and said many handguns are used in illegal activities.
"This is not a law which takes away the rights to keep and bear arms," Dellinger said. "It regulates one kind of weapon: handguns."
Singer said she will ask for a 30-day extension to file the District's appeal with the Supreme Court, which would push the deadline to Sept. 5. The city's handgun laws will remain in effect throughout the appeal, Singer said.
Q:
I don't know what exactly they teach in law school that makes simple English so difficult to understand.
A: Pretty much everything.
Posted by: ThomasD at July 19, 2007 08:02 PM
esti, thanks for posting that article. It was very good reading.esti said:
esti said:Q:
I don't know what exactly they teach in law school that makes simple English so difficult to understand.
A: Pretty much everything.
Posted by: ThomasD at July 19, 2007 08:02 PM
They do.Gunstar1 said:I hope they don't, they already had one extension.
That's what I would call a false assumption. Cars are used in illegal activities, like speeding, parking in a yellow zone, drunk driving, driving away from the scene of a crime, etc. So, according to that argument, we should get rid of ALL cars?...several high-profile constitutional law experts, including former acting solicitor general Walter E. Dellinger III. She called the city's handgun laws "reasonable" and said many handguns are used in illegal activities.
I believe you should be asking Sarah that question, not us.Malum Prohibitum said:Why did I just get a panicky email from Sarah Brady asking for a donation because of this appeal? They are not defending it.