TSA Does Not Want You To See This Video

Discussion in 'Off-topic' started by EJR914, Dec 3, 2010.

  1. EJR914

    EJR914 Cheezburger Operator

    44,830
    186
    63
    Could be NSFW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMlDVLlAEUU (Contains TSA body scan)

    Neither does the second United States Secretary of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush and co-author of the USA PATRIOT Act Michael Chertoff, the current Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, Administrator of the United States Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and former Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation John Pistole, or President Barack Obama.

    If you want to learn more on the government scam and the slick salesman, Michael Chertoff, just google him. He stands to profit financially from the sale of these scanners. He is a security consultant for the companies that manufacture the scanners. No inside deal there. A former DHS secretary, selling these scanners to our current DHS secretary. All they while the scanners cost $150,000 and do not detect explosives, yet a $8,500 bomb stiffing dog does? The FBI uses these dogs at their main office, and so do soldiers in Iraq and A'stan where bombs go off everyday, but we don't use them here? We'd rather grope women and children and stick our hands down their pants looking for bombs or put them through the porno scanners?

    Didn't Pistole just say that these scanners are a direct result of the underwear bomber?

    But didn't the Government Accountability Office say that they are not sure these scanners would have been able to see the "underwear bombers" explosives?

    http://www.banderasnews.com/1011/edat-bodyscanners.htm

    http://www.examiner.com/charleston-demo ... nder=print

    I heard this on national news, about the GAO, and it turns out to be true. I'm now fully convinced that these scanners have nothing to do with making us any more safe. It has to do with money from this scam, and of course getting us to throw away our entire 4th amendment rights for the illusion of temporary safety.

    All involved, Michael Chertoff, Janet Napolitano, John Pistole, and Barack Obama disgust me. I can't even watch them when I see them spouting their junk on the TV everyday. After all, Janet is Obama's girl, and she works for him, so obviously he is agreeing with all of this or it would end tomorrow.
     
  2. TimBob

    TimBob Old, Slow, Boring Dude

    2,370
    127
    63
    Fantastic find, EJR! I watched the entire video... and now I'll have trouble sleeping!
     

  3. EJR914

    EJR914 Cheezburger Operator

    44,830
    186
    63
    Thank you, just trying to do my part to spread what a scam the entire thing is. The FBI doesn't use these scanners at their main office, they use the bomb sniffing dogs to find explosives. So do soldiers in areas where bombs go off everyday. They don't use these scanners. :righton:
     
  4. Jmark

    Jmark Active Member

    2,189
    0
    36
    The photo they used as an example of the scanner is fake.
     
  5. EJR914

    EJR914 Cheezburger Operator

    44,830
    186
    63
    Spent a lot of time staring at the photo? :lol: To be honest, does it matter? The porno scanners do the exact same thing. If that's the only problem with the video then we are all good. Still doesn't change the information in the video. :righton:
     
  6. Jmark

    Jmark Active Member

    2,189
    0
    36
    No, just saw a thread in another forum where they took the same photo's and colorized them to make it look real. In reality they were only reversing what was done in photoshop.

    There are real examples here.
    http://blog.tsa.gov/2010/01/whats-wrong-with-this-picture.html
     
  7. CoffeeMate

    CoffeeMate Junior Butt Warmer

    46,427
    9
    0
    Whether the photo is faked or not doesn't change the fact that the scanners are pretty much worthless when compared to a trained dog.
     
  8. JMan

    JMan New Member

    4,352
    0
    0
    When 911 happen everyone blamed the USA Gov not protecting us . Now that they are trying to make sure that will not happen again everyone complains . Look at the number people that died that day , what would you think they (dead)and (family) would think about this . I bet they wished this was up and running then .

    I am not complaining I am Happy and would let them do what ever they needed to , to make sure my country is safe. yes that includes a cavity search :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  9. AzB

    AzB Well-Known Member

    2,361
    61
    48
    That's not the issue.

    The issue is that we could be safer using better security that is less intrusive, and that the TSA is above reproach. I would never trade the illusion of safety today for loss of my rights tomorrow.

    Az
     
  10. drtybykr

    drtybykr New Member

    2,823
    1
    0


    Wow, I read that post, and all I can say is that you are being the good little sheep your government wants you to be.
    [​IMG]
     
  11. EJR914

    EJR914 Cheezburger Operator

    44,830
    186
    63
    BAAAAAAHHHHHHHH! :sheep:

    Our current government representatives loves people such as yourself.
     
  12. CoffeeMate

    CoffeeMate Junior Butt Warmer

    46,427
    9
    0
    If you want to volunteer your cavity you go right ahead. But please don't try to volunteer mine.
     
  13. JMan

    JMan New Member

    4,352
    0
    0
    Sounds to me neither of you lost anyone due to the 911 so you can't speak from the heart how it touched family members .I am glad they are doing everything they can to protect us from another 911 attack or what ever date they choose .
     
  14. budder

    budder Moderator Staff Member

    If they were doing everything they can, they would destroy all planes. Right now, they are barely doing anything.
     
  15. Taurus92

    Taurus92 Well-Known Member

    9,458
    111
    63
    :righton: Exactly. Don't question their authority!
     
  16. EJR914

    EJR914 Cheezburger Operator

    44,830
    186
    63
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion

    Someone should add this to wikipedia as a perfect example.

    As Ben Franklin said, you deserve neither liberty nor safety.

    You would give up all your rights just for the illusion of safety. :roll:

    Edit: To add to this, if you did lose someone in the terrorist attacks I'm very sorry about that, blame the terrorist and America's foreign policy that lead to this, but don't ask any of us to give up our 4th amendment rights. You are free to give up every right that you have, just don't ask or expect me to be ok with one Constitutionally protected right infringed or violated. I'm very upset with my government for violating everyone's 4th amendment rights, and I always will be.
     
  17. drtybykr

    drtybykr New Member

    2,823
    1
    0

    As a matter of fact, I did lose someone very important to me. And I will scream from the rooftops that the TSA is doing nothing to protect us from anything. They will never do anything to protect us. Every regulation they place on Americans, erases another of our rights.

    Keep singing your song Baaaaaaah!!!! :sheep:

    This is what the TSA lines will look like before long. Glad to see you are in line already.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. phantoms

    phantoms Senior Mumbler

    6,148
    168
    63
    I posted this image in another thread, but it fits this post every bit as much.
    [​IMG]
     
  19. livesounder

    livesounder New Member

    2,176
    0
    0
    EJR, You post a lot here - some things I agree with, others not so much.

    The quote above, however, I find to be one of the most succinct, straight-forward summaries of the "safety" vs. "freedom" battle that I have seen or heard.

    Very well phrased.