Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner
1 - 20 of 26 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,139 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Published today in Brewer v. State of GA by the GA Sup Ct http://www.gasupreme.us/pdf/s06a1104.pdf , the court artfully dodges deciding whether firearms seizure subsequent to a drug arrest violates the US 2A and the GA Const.'s assurances. Here is the relevant text:

2. We find no merit in appellant's argument that OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) violates his right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. As this Court has long recognized, the construction given the Federal constitution by the United States Supreme Court is conclusive, Strickland v. State, 137 Ga. 1, 8-9 (72 SE 271) (1911), and under controlling opinions from that Court, the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms" imposes a limitation on only Federal, not state, legislative efforts. Id. at 9. See Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 265 (6 SC 580, 29 LE 615) (1886); United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 552 (23 LE 588) (1875). See also Bach v. Pataki, 408 F3d 75, 84 (2nd Cir. 2005). Appellant's argument under the State Constitution was not raised and ruled on below and thus we do not address it. See generally Wilson v. State, 212 Ga. 157 (1) (91 SE2d 16) (1956) (court will not pass upon constitutionality of statute not directly and properly made below and distinctly passed on by trial court).

So they basically say, using a case from 1911, that the Sup Ct. has not used the 14th A to apply the 2A to the states, and that the GA Const. argument was not properly made below. While perhaps technically correct, this is one serious dodge. What a bunch of pansies! I hope there's a Sup Ct cert petition asking the question, does the 14th apply the 2nd to the states? This is not a particularly good test case, however, as it involves drugs.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
Argh! Justice Hunstein cited Strickland! See what I mean, Mike?
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
They also cite U.S. v. Cruikshank as authority for the proposition that the Second Amendment applies only to Congress and not the states. Want to know a little more about that case?

Man, how intellectually dishonest can one get? Everybody on this site needs to READ United States v. Cruikshank so that they can combat this horse manure whenever it comes up! It is a case about nullifying the Fourteenth Amendment so that whites can oppress blacks!

US v. Cruikshank was NOT, strictly speaking, a Second Amendment case. Why, then, is it cited by the anti-gunner judges every time the Second Amendment is proposed in litigation as a bar to state laws restricting the right to keep and bear arms?

Because they are dishonest. :sly:

US v. Cruikshank held that NO constitutional rights of black citizens being infringed by the states are subject to review by the federal courts.

That is what the judges are upholding!

A little history. The Colifax massacre was the slaughter of over one hundred black Americans by a white mob. The Supreme Court held that the federal legislation under which the white murderers were indicted was faulty, because Congress could not enforce the Fourteenth Amendment against the states. The Court specifically pointed to the FIRST Amendment as well as the Second (wonder why they never mention that?).

The right of the people peaceably to assemble for lawful purposes existed long before the adoption of the Constitution of the United States. In fact, it is, and always has been, one of the attributes of citizenship under a free government... It is found wherever civilization exists. It was not, therefore, a right granted to the people by the Constitution. The government of the United States when established found it in existence, with the obligation on the part of the States to afford it protection...

The first amendment to the Constitution prohibits Congress from abridging "the right of the people to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." This, like the other amendments proposed and adopted at the same time, was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens, but to operate upon the National government alone...

...For their protection in its enjoyment, therefore, the people must look to the States. The power for that purpose was originally placed there, and it has never been surrendered to the United States.
How anyone could cite this garbage of a case in this day and age is beyond me.

This case stands for the proposition that a state may take away the free speech, religous, and other first amendment rights of its black citizens, in addition to the right to bear arms, and there is nothing Congress can do about it, even if the "deprivation of rights" in question is the massacre of scores of free citizens!

Remember this next time you see an anti reference to this case! Recognize the reality of what it is that is being cited.

:soapbox:

Here is a decent summary of it for those not inclined to read the whole case.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
Ok, so its just me, but maybe this is what you get on a court where only one justice was appointed by a Republican Governor in our lifetimes.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
Justice Hunstein, the author of this opinion, won re-election last month in a landslide. :roll:

It just gets under my skin that any court would cite to a case about a massacre of citizens for the proposition that a federal constitutional right may be invaded with impunity by state governments. It is offensive!

However, this is probably the most frequently cited case on the issue of whether the Second Amendment applies to the states.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,172 Posts
Malum Prohibitum said:
It just gets under my skin that any court would cite to a case about a massacre of citizens for the proposition that a federal constitutional right may be invaded with impunity by state governments. It is offensive!

However, this is probably the most frequently cited case on the issue of whether the Second Amendment applies to the states.
That truly is offensive! Thanks for the history lesson.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
Keep your fingers crossed! If Parker is upheld by the United States Supreme Court, it will be reversal time for Brewer v. Georgia!
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
Malum Prohibitum said:
Keep your fingers crossed! If Parker is upheld by the United States Supreme Court, it will be reversal time for Brewer v. Georgia!
That is, um, once a 14th Amendment incorporation case works its way through the system . . .
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
kkennett said:
Yes, incorporation is a taller order, and less sure to succeed.
I think it is likely to succeed and almost assured if the Heller case is successful at the Supreme Court.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,306 Posts
For a minute I thought I was in good ol' OB Zimmer's class back in college. MP - my old CJ teacher went on a rant one day about that case in about the same way that you just did. He felt that if a third of the voting population knew just what case was being thrown around that they'd all be stripped from the bench under protest.

I'll never forget that one.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,033 Posts
Speaking of voting populations and the Justice's re-election... I can accept the election of local judges, but the fact the Georgia Supreme Court justices are elected just completely boggles my mind. :bigshock:

What does my vote mean when it's up against an estimated 9,363,341 morons whose main source of news is Entertainment Tonight??

:banghead:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,306 Posts
I think this may be the first time I am utterly speechless.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,743 Posts
A little more on Cruikshank. The court later addresses the 14th Amendment, but notes that it restrains only state action, not private deprivations of constitutional rights.

The murdering mob did not consist of state actors.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,598 Posts
The "MrMorden gets the **** out of Georgia" countdown timer just got one tick closer to 0.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,306 Posts
MrMorden said:
The "MrMorden gets the **** out of Georgia" countdown timer just got one tick closer to 0.
Unfortunately you're not that far from how I feel.
 
1 - 20 of 26 Posts
Top