Joined
·
11,745 Posts
An article worth reading.
http://townhall.com/columnists/thom...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
http://townhall.com/columnists/thom...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
An article worth reading.
http://townhall.com/columnists/thom...l&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
An excellent question.But if tighter restrictions on gun ownership do not reduce murders, what is the point of tighter gun control laws
But if tighter restrictions on gun ownership do not reduce murders, what is the point of tighter gun control laws -- and what is the point of demonizing the National Rifle Association?
Indeed. But that's never stopped a progressive or a statist from pushing their agenda.In both England and the United States, those people most zealous for tighter gun control laws tend also to be most lenient toward criminals and most restrictive on police. The net result is that law-abiding citizens become more vulnerable when they are disarmed and criminals disobey gun control laws, as they disobey other laws.
The facts are too plain to be ignored.
It isn't gun control, it is simply "Control" that the Progressives want. Healthcare, guns, media, everything.An excellent question.