Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Firearms' started by gsusnake, Oct 19, 2007.
http://www.sigsauer.com/Products/ShowCa ... ductid=211
That would be perfect for the carbine class....
It's only $1800!
You could buy two, and give me one for Christmas!
Or my birthday, which is only three short weeks after Christmas...
Add me to your Christmas list guys [-o<
Thats one bad Rifle
Looks too bulky...or front heavy...or something.
Let me think about that for a minute.....No.
I like that grip-light combo, anyone know where you can buy something like that? Doesn't have to be Sig brand....The grip alone would be ideal if it took a surefire light.
Hence the foregrip.
Well still... Weapon balance is still a factor no matter how you hold the front end.
Uh... it's a regular 556 with a quad rail adn a goofy VFG. Those front rails are pretty light, and that barrel looks light, as well. I doubt it's very front heavy.
The 556 is one sexy beast, and is on my "list."
For that much scratch why couldn't they put a pull adjustable folding stock like the one on a FN SCAR or a Magpul Masada? It'd make the package a lot handier and not like something out of a Tapco catalog.
I bought a regular SIG 556 and set it up the way I like I like it. Ace LTD side folder, HK 416 sights, PRI flash hider and a Aimpoint Comp M2 (not pictured) I love it! I would love to have that rail system off this model!
Trim about 8 inches off that thing and you MIGHT be able to swing it around corners.
Get rid of the light and stop pretending as if it's a CQB weapon.
+1 I have to agree its a Mid range rifle and that is the most retarded tactical light grip or what ever it is Ive ever seen!