debate
all presidential candidates should debate each other, and face tough Q&A sessions with journalists, and with the public at town hall type meetings.
Whether a debate would help Trump or hurt Trump, it's the right thing to do.
Americans have a right to know what he thinks, directly from him, not from a press release composed by his staff (even if most politicians don't really answer questions during debates; they just go back to their talking points of memorized sound bytes on various topics).
I'll hold my nose and vote for Trump if he has a chance.
However, if it looks like he's sure to lose, I'll switch my expected vote from him to the Libertarian, Johnson. Either way, we'll get Hillary, but at least I can say I spent my vote in a way that helps a third party without having withheld it from a GOP candidate that could have used it to win.
I really wish that a bunch of registered and likely Democrats would consider voting for Gary Johnson rather than Crooked Hillery. If the Dems would split their vote instead of uniting behind her, I'd join a bunch of GOP'ers in splitting our vote and supporting Johnson.
But Democrats love Big Brother government, cradle-to-grave entitlement programs, socialism, and regulation of business. There's no way a small-government libertarian would ever get much support from people who regularly vote "D"