Joined
·
4,742 Posts
You are a certifiable H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E :!:
I didn't take it as an anti-war stunt. This woman does nothing but spew out her hatred for guns and yet has the audacity to insist that her bodyguards carry to protect her and her children? Hypocrite. Plain and simple. That's the way I see it anyway.pro2am said:I"m sure it was a publicity stunt that is an anti-war statement.
There's probably some Palestinian kid putting her picture up as a poster in his bedroom....but then again maybe not.
There is a difference between a grown man or woman deciding of his/her own free will to defend the nation and child soldiers. She's a dumb one. Pay no mind to her."It's fascinating to me that an image of a child dressed up as a soldier evokes so much attention yet the real soldiers - their deaths - their wounded bodies doesn't seem to faze most or make news"
I thought she adopted. I just figured no amount of alcohol or money could make a man do that with her.gsusnake said:The question no one has asked yet...
Who was desperate enough to bork Rosie?
There is also artificial insimination... however I think the same would apply to the technician.Rammstein said:I thought she adopted. I just figured no amount of alcohol or money could make a man do that with her.gsusnake said:The question no one has asked yet...
Who was desperate enough to bork Rosie?
I got told in no uncertain terms that I can't useGeorgiaGlocker said:? Thats a new one on me. Yeah, I know gunny... Dwight D Eisenhower.
Scroll to the bottom of this to back up Ramm's point:Rammstein said:I just figured no amount of alcohol or money could make a man do that with her.
I think, in this case, you can spell it H-I-P-P-O-C-R-I-T-E.GeorgiaGlocker said:You are a certifiable H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E :!:
:lol:M249 said:I think, in this case, you can spell it H-I-P-P-O-C-R-I-T-E.GeorgiaGlocker said:You are a certifiable H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E :!: