Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,292 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
The Democrat even brings in a terrorist victim to prove it. The logic and reasoning displayed in this article is undeniable. Don't try to deny it.

Narrowly behind in some polls and with just a few days before Election Day, Democrat John Adler came out swinging during a news conference Thursday, accusing Republican opponent Jon Runyan of taking a lax position on denying firearms to terrorists.

Speaking during a conference call with area media, Adler said his assertion was based on Runyan’s A-rating by the National Rifle Association . . .
http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/b ... ntrol.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
197 Posts
I couldn't help myself I had to leave a comment.-now I feel stupid though. I had a typo & can't find a way there to edit it. I guess I need to learn to do a better job of proof reading before posting.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,172 Posts
I believe it was Winston Churchill who compared politics to sausage making, but he was talking about back room deals. Now, the political ads and statements make watching sausage being made look pleasant and enjoyable by comparison.

This guy must really be disparate! I know nothing about either candidate. Based on his comments, I hope this idiot Adler loses.

Nice post MikeJ. Maybe it's my old eyes, but I missed the typo...
 

·
Seasteading Aficionado
Joined
·
44,896 Posts
There is no way he heck I'd ever support barring men the right to keep and bear a firearm because they are on some BS "government watch list." Its completely absurd. Do you know how many people get on that list in error? Do you know how easy it is for DHS, the FBI, or the DOJ to just call you a terrorist for no real reason, and then you can never defend yourself with a firearm ever again?

No way I would support that. After all, terrorist lately like to blow things up a whole lot more than they do going around shooting people, one person at the time. Sorry, I just don't trust them enough to allow such legislation.
 

·
Senior Mumbler
Joined
·
6,523 Posts
EJR914 said:
There is no way he heck I'd ever support barring men the right to keep and bear a firearm because they are on some BS "government watch list." Its completely absurd. Do you know how many people get on that list in error? Do you know how easy it is for DHS, the FBI, or the DOJ to just call you a terrorist for no real reason, and then you can never defend yourself with a firearm ever again?

No way I would support that. After all, terrorist lately like to blow things up a whole lot more than they do going around shooting people, one person at the time. Sorry, I just don't trust them enough to allow such legislation.
I went with my sister who was purchasing a used vehicle this weekend, to drive back her vehicle for her. This was from a used car dealership. She had to sign a Homeland Security background release form to be able to purchase a used vehicle. That right there tells you how backwards things have got.
 

·
Paratrooper
Joined
·
609 Posts
EJR914 said:
There is no way he heck I'd ever support barring men the right to keep and bear a firearm because they are on some BS "government watch list." Its completely absurd. Do you know how many people get on that list in error? Do you know how easy it is for DHS, the FBI, or the DOJ to just call you a terrorist for no real reason, and then you can never defend yourself with a firearm ever again?

No way I would support that. After all, terrorist lately like to blow things up a whole lot more than they do going around shooting people, one person at the time. Sorry, I just don't trust them enough to allow such legislation.
The Speaker of the House has classified people like as possible terrorists so I can image the three letter agencies have as well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,570 Posts
darkstar3d said:
EJR914 said:
There is no way he heck I'd ever support barring men the right to keep and bear a firearm because they are on some BS "government watch list." Its completely absurd. Do you know how many people get on that list in error? Do you know how easy it is for DHS, the FBI, or the DOJ to just call you a terrorist for no real reason, and then you can never defend yourself with a firearm ever again?

No way I would support that. After all, terrorist lately like to blow things up a whole lot more than they do going around shooting people, one person at the time. Sorry, I just don't trust them enough to allow such legislation.
The (current,soon to be replaced)Speaker of the House has classified people like as possible terrorists so I can image the three letter agencies have as well.
FTFY
 

·
Seasteading Aficionado
Joined
·
44,896 Posts
phantoms said:
EJR914 said:
There is no way he heck I'd ever support barring men the right to keep and bear a firearm because they are on some BS "government watch list." Its completely absurd. Do you know how many people get on that list in error? Do you know how easy it is for DHS, the FBI, or the DOJ to just call you a terrorist for no real reason, and then you can never defend yourself with a firearm ever again?

No way I would support that. After all, terrorist lately like to blow things up a whole lot more than they do going around shooting people, one person at the time. Sorry, I just don't trust them enough to allow such legislation.
I went with my sister who was purchasing a used vehicle this weekend, to drive back her vehicle for her. This was from a used car dealership. She had to sign a Homeland Security background release form to be able to purchase a used vehicle. That right there tells you how backwards things have got.
I heard about that... things are getting completely out of control.
 

·
Paratrooper
Joined
·
609 Posts
darkstar3d said:
The Speaker of the House has classified people like as possible terrorists so I can image the three letter agencies have as well.
Wow! I can tell I had drank a few shots of Cognac when I wrote this!
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top