Joined
·
14,062 Posts
Report above continued. Pay close attention to #10. This could be a biggie! ! !
I think its not a good idea to edit unrelated (by my thoughts) out and a link to the full note.
The service carrying the full email where a link went to it made it not possible to continue that for VCDL. So you all get the whole thing.
Nemo
I think its not a good idea to edit unrelated (by my thoughts) out and a link to the full note.
The service carrying the full email where a link went to it made it not possible to continue that for VCDL. So you all get the whole thing.
Nemo
10. U.S. Supreme Court to decide if police can enter home without warrant to seize guns We'll be keeping an eye on this one.
Supreme Court Will Decide Whether Police Can Enter A Home To Seize Guns Without A Warrant
https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/02/05/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-police-can-enter-a-home-to-seize-guns-without-a-warrant/?sh=5ef041bb5bb4
11. "Wolf in sheep's clothing" - gun control opinion piece by a "gun owner" https://www.virginiamercury.com/2021/02/10/gun-laws-are-common-sense/
"John Crimmins of Chesapeake is a Second Amendment supporter and a retired Chesapeake police officer." Second Amendment supporter? I don't believe it. Although, perhaps Crimmins is simply following in the footsteps of gun-grabber Senator Chuck Schumer from New York, who is a gun owner, and claims to be a "Second Amendment supporter," too.
From the opinion piece we are to believe that Crimmins is a Second Amendment supporter, yet he doesn't know the difference between gun safety and gun control. That's like a car owner not knowing the difference between looking both ways before entering an intersection and having to pay an annual tax on his vehicle to be able to drive it on public roads.
"These extremists are fixated on using a gun to protect themselves but rarely spare a thought for the individuals who may be killed, injured, or threatened with these guns."
I'll bet Crimmins rarely spares a thought as to who may be killed or injured by him owning and driving a vehicle.
The piece is loaded with gun-control lingo that could just as easily have been written by Demanding Mom Shannon Watts. Each paragraph has a gem that can be easily torn apart, but I'm not going to sped the time doing so. Suffice it to say that I'm shocked that a police officer who has dealt with criminals face-to-face could have gotten everything so wrong.
12. What happened when the U.S. Government confiscated guns for "Safety & Protection"
Just ask the Sioux Indians: https://freedomoutpost.com/what-happened-when-the-us-government-confiscated-guns-for-safety-protection-in-the-past/
13. Modern sporting rifles as bear stoppers? Yep. Dan has some interesting columns. This one is on the effectiveness of modern sporting rifles on bears, including polar bears!
https://www.ammoland.com/2021/02/modern-sporting-rifles-as-bear-stoppers-they-worked-in-every-recorded-incident
14. Factually challenged Letter to the Editor about "white racists" being in downtown Richmond on January 18
A letter to the Editor full of information that isn't so. And by an attorney nonetheless. My comments on this one are in blue:
http://richmondfreepress.com/news/2021/jan/21/gun-prohibition-needs-be-applied/
Once again, citizens of the city of Richmond avoided Downtown on the Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday as a group of white supremacists smelled their musk and paraded in soldier costumes, flaunting assault weapons, each having a magazine of 30 to 40 bullets. [PVC: How exactly does Mr. Baugh know the number of rounds of ammunition (not "bullets") that are in those magazines? If Mr. Baugh doesn't know the difference between "rounds" and "bullets," he's unlikely to know much about magazines.]
Clearly, these men meant to instill some fear and trepidation in the citizens of our city like the night riders of the Ku Klux Klan - "Keep them scared." There is a very thinly veiled threat. [PVC: So, if this was about keeping people "scared," where was the associated violence?]
When will this city enforce the laws of the Commonwealth against these tactics? Is this tactic of not applying the laws of the Commonwealth against these men by design of the mayor or the chief of police?
True, Mayor Levar M. Stoney is not a lawyer and might not be familiar with the Virginia's criminal statutes. But I would assume his Police Chief Gerald Smith, if asked the question "Is this against the law?" would be intelligently advised.
Pursuant to Section 18.2-287.4 of the Virginia Code, "Carry- ing loaded firearms in public areas prohibited; penalties," it is illegal to carry a loaded weapon with "a magazine that will hold more than 20 rounds ... or equipped with a folding stock ... on any public street, road, alley, sidewalk, public right-of-way or in any public park or any other place of whatever nature that is open to the public." [PVC: Mr. Baugh says he is a lawyer, yet he doesn't correctly quote the law. There is a major exception to 18.2-287.4 - CHP holders are exempt. The law also does not apply to firearms chambered in a rimfire caliber. Since there are over 700,000 CHP holders in Virginia alone (20 million nationally), seeing someone openly carrying a firearm in Richmond does not give the police probable cause to stop the person merely because they are carrying a firearm.]
This law applies to 13 specified cities and counties, including Richmond.
There is a lot of recent talk of equal treatment in the criminal justice system in the United States and Virginia.
Mayor Stoney, if you did not know of Va. Code Section 18.2- 287.4, you are getting bad advice, are being intentionally tricked or Chief Smith missed that day at the police academy. One of you, Mr. Mayor or Chief Smith, really should change jobs. [PVC: Mr. Baugh should be careful of throwing stones when it comes to not understanding 18.2-287.4, as well as the lack of probably cause for the police to stop someone merely for the possession of a firearm.]
When the white supremacists come to our city, my tax dollars demand the laws that apply to me also apply to them. [PVC: Videos I saw from that day showed everyone, black, white, and otherwise, all getting along just fine.]
Just maybe arresting a few of them and forfeiting their big masculine props could dissuade them. Just maybe.
DAVID P. BAUGH
Richmond
The writer is a former federal prosecutor and veteran criminal defense attorney.