Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act

Discussion in 'National Laws, Bills and Politics' started by Gunstar1, Jul 28, 2005.

  1. Gunstar1

    Gunstar1 Administrator

    8,460
    5
    38
    S397 is similar to last years version that was killed instead of allowing the Assault Weapon Ban to be renewed with it.

    It has been amended once so far, SA1626. It requires a gun lock to be with every purchase of a handgun.
     
  2. Gunstar1

    Gunstar1 Administrator

    8,460
    5
    38
    All the amendment means is that guns will cost 2-5 dollars more, and my box of gun locks will need to be bigger.
     

  3. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    63,041
    229
    63
    If it is required, if it is federal law, then what is the later liability for the end user who deos not use it? Hmmmm . . .

    Who allowed this amendment, anyway?

    Is this really what the founders meant by the Commerce Clause?
     
  4. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    63,041
    229
    63
  5. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    63,041
    229
    63
    This Just In

    THIS JUST IN - S397 passes Senate.
     
  6. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    63,041
    229
    63