Preemption Case in Ohio S. Ct.

Discussion in 'In the News' started by Malum Prohibitum, Sep 28, 2007.

  1. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    67,014
    1,419
    113
    http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stori ... 619&EDATE=

    On Wednesday, The Ohio Supreme Court accepted an appeal by the City of Clyde in Ohioans For Concealed Carry, Inc. et. al. v. City of Clyde, et. al.

    The original lawsuit, filed in 2004, challenged the city of Clyde's ordinance that allowed posting of signs to prohibit otherwise legal handguns being carried by licensed Ohioans in local city park . . .
     
  2. Gunstar1

    Gunstar1 Administrator

    8,460
    5
    38
    sounds eerily familiar
     

  3. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    67,014
    1,419
    113
    Cities Fight For Gun Laws

    Clyde, Ohio, is a small town, but its legal quest to keep guns out of city parks could have a big effect on firearms laws across the state.

    The Ohio Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Sandusky County town's appeal of a court ruling that struck down its anti-gun ordinance as being in conflict with state law. . . .
     
  4. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    67,014
    1,419
    113
  5. Macktee

    Macktee New Member

    6,172
    0
    0
    It just goes on and on and on..... :puke:

    Even in the face of, and in direct contravention of, clearly written state laws, some cities insist on enforcing their own illegal laws.

    But, hey! Why shouldn't they? There's no risk. The people pushing these bans aren't spending their money. No! The people fighting the cities are spending their money! Which sorta sucks...!
     
  6. seajay

    seajay NRA Certified Instructor

    4,996
    0
    36
    So if I live in that city I pay both sides.