Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner
1 - 20 of 254 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
760 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I've read that this is technically legal. The GFL is a firearms permit, not a concealed carry permit. But how often have you actually seen people do it?

I can't imagine the reactions that I would get if I did so in Atlanta.
 

·
Romans 10:13
Joined
·
4,648 Posts
It is rare to see someone open carry. I have seen it only once. It was a Flash Foods place about 4 months ago. I will only conceal carry myself. Just my personal preference.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,593 Posts
I used to see it more when I was in the West End area after dark. Excluding police officers, guards and store owners I have seen it some.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
No, way! Don't do it! It is unethical, immoral, probably illegal, and likely fattening.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,119 Posts
I do it from time to time. I feel like a thug with my weapon in an IWB holster that's in plain view. I feel like it look too much like I just have a gun jammed in my waistband...

Oh well.

I'm usually wearing a nice, respectable shirt and tie, so I don't look like too much of a gang banger.

I neeed another holster...
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
In all seriousness - it is not just "technically" legal. So long as you are in your home, car, or place of business, there is no law preventing it. If you have a firearms license, of course, you can carry outside of those places.

There was even a short time when the Attorney General (Mike Bowers, at the time) declared that the firearms license did not permit concealed carry. Thus, the only option would have been open carry. The General Assembly quickly slapped that opinion down by adding "may be concealed" to the statute. How one could have carried openly in a "briefcase," one option in the statute, is beyond me. :roll:

But I ask this - is it some technicality that allows open carry when a statute says you may carry a gun with a license and you may conceal it?

It sounds like open carry is the preferred method in the law to me.

As for whether it is accepted, try it out once you get your license (which ought to be sometime in 2007 in DeKalb County :roll: ). You will find that it is less of an "event" than you might otherwise expect. Just make sure you are not in an "off limits" place.

I carried openly into Home Depot last week. I had not yet repaired the air conditioning in my car, and it was like 94 degrees outside, and I just was not in the mood to put my blazer on. I did have a tie on, with my shirt sleeves rolled up, due to the heat. I walked in, did my business, and left. They even accepted my money!

Nobody looked at me funny. From what I could tell, only one employee even noticed, and he merely glanced at the gun (same as I would have done) and went on about his business. And it is not as if this gun was hard to notice. It was 45 H&K outside the waistband with a stainless steel slide. The holster even lets the bottom protrude out, so it is very obvious what it is.

No issues.

This is the same Home Depot where I was stopped outside the store a couple of Christmases ago by a police officer for open carrying. He did not want to see my license - he wanted to "talk guns!"

:D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
310 Posts
I usually carry concealed, unless I am going where people know me...My local Publix and local Quicktrips and other conveneince stores....In fact the convenience store pople seem to appreciate it when I show up sometimes...LOL....

But in places like Target, the Mall, Walmart etc, it's always concealed, partly due the amount of kids and parents there, and the fact that sometimes, they have a public gathering in their public place.....
 

·
Sledgehammer
Joined
·
4,812 Posts
Malum Prohibitum said:
But I ask this - is it some technicality that allows open carry when a statute says you may carry a gun with a license and you may conceal it?

It sounds like open carry is the preferred method in the law to me.
I know your question was somewhat rhetorical, but, given my success in convincing you that the media report fairly :lol:, I'll answer. I'm not going to look up citations to support what are about to be several statements of legal principle. Challenge any of them you do not believe to be accurate.

Criminal statutes are construed strictly against the government.

No conduct is criminal unless the statute says it is criminal (i.e., that which is not prohibited is permitted).

"May" generally is permissive.

The answer, then: No. It is no mere technicality that one may carry openly. A criminal statute cannot express a preference. It either criminalizes the behavior, or it doesn't. It is an exception to the general prohibition against carrying a weapon that one may carry a handgun with a license. Construing the exception strictly against the state, when the statute does not say the carry must be open or concealed, either is valid exception (Michael Bowers' opinion notwithstanding).
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,460 Posts
I will go a little farther.
16-11-126 says that unless you have a carry license
(a) A person commits the offense of carrying a concealed weapon when such person knowingly has or carries about his or her person, unless in an open manner and fully exposed to view,
So 126 says open carry of all firearms is legal, but you cannot conceal it without a licnese.

16-11-128 says
(a) A person commits the offense of carrying a pistol without a license when he has or carries on or about his person, outside of his home, motor vehicle, or place of business, any pistol or revolver without having on his person a valid license...
128 says you cannot carry a pistol without a license. If 126 already covered concealed carry, the only type of carry left that 128 could be talking about is open carry, which it says with a license is legal.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
Those who carry concealed are scoudrels and cads. No respectable gentlemen would conceal his weapon, as this indicates premediated planning to ambush, through surprise, another human being.
 

·
Lawyer and Gun Activist
Joined
·
28,439 Posts
I have, Don't now

I have open carried on occasions where I could give a very satisfactory answer to the question: "Why do you have a gun? Are you a cop or something?" My answer would have been, " I am on my way to/from the shooting range, hunting field, etc." Or in one case, I was attending a gun show and I walked across the street to a restaurant for lunch, wearing a sidearm and with a combat shotgun slung over my shoulder. Since everybody in the area knew I gun show was going on, I figured people would understand. (And I suppose they did. Nobody seemed concerned).

I do not carry openly as often now, not at all in the last few years. I just don't want to spook any sheeple. If I did, even though I may be legally in the right under the CURRENT LAW as it exists TODAY, a single episode of a soccer mom crying while being interviewed on TV about the "trauma" she experienced by seeing an armed civilian in a public place where she shops WITH HER CHILDREN, no less, by God, we must do something, if only for the sake of the children... she could get the legislators to amend the law and ban open carry in public places. I think they would do it. So my attitude is, don't give them an excuse to change the law and make it more restrictive.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,460 Posts
Malum Prohibitum said:
Thos who carry concealed are scoudrels and cads. No respectable gentlemen would conceal his weapon, as this indicates premediated planning to ambush, through surprise, another human being.
I wanted to be a scoundrel ever since I saw The Empire Strikes Back. 8)
Why you... stuck-up, half-witted, scruffy-looking, nerf herder!
.
.
.
.
.
Who's scruffy lookin?
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
Brigands and highwaymen!

Seen at the Volokh Conspiracy:

Nah. The 2nd amendment protects the right to keep and bear, own and carry, weapons. Not the right to carry them hidden. At the time the 2nd amendment was ratified, concealing a weapon was considered to be the sort of thing only a highwayman or similar criminal would do, whereas honest men bore their weapons openly.

I think in some respects fighting for concealed carry reform, instead of fighting to prevent the prosecution of open carry as "brandishing", was a mistake. Open carry at least has the advantage of getting people used to seeing guns again, which goes a long way toward extinguishing the phobias the gun control movement works to encourage.


:D
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
And a post directly in response:


Uh, no. The first laws against concealed carry (which were always full of weird exemptions that rendered them hard to enforce with any regularity) were the last phase of an attempt to stop dueling. My book (mentioned above) has a detailed history of the motivations and legislative and judicial history in the eight states that adopted such laws before 1840. The evidence is very clear for Kentucky, and somewhat less clear for the other states, that the sequence was:

1. Ban dueling. Juries won't convict.

2. Require elected officials, judges, militia officers, and sometimes, lawyers, to swear an oath affirming that they had not participated in a duel, after a particular date.

3. In response, instead of the elaborate sequence of challenging another man to a duel, which sometimes led to reconciliation without bloodshed, when insulted or otherwise provoked, men of political ambitions would simply draw a knife or a pistol and kill the other party. People were, it seems, prepared to kill each over insults, but not to perjure themselves about it. (Bizarre.)

4. Okay, so we'll ban concealed carry. This prevents anyone from taking advantage of another person who doesn't know that you are armed. Also, it takes away the excuse, "I had to shoot him because I thought he might be armed."


I think in some respects fighting for concealed carry reform, instead of fighting to prevent the prosecution of open carry as "brandishing", was a mistake. Open carry at least has the advantage of getting people used to seeing guns again, which goes a long way toward extinguishing the phobias the gun control movement works to encourage.

The fact is that bans on concealed carry are relatively modern (in most of the U.S.), and the courts have not even consistently refused to recognize concealed carry as constitutionally protected.

Concealed carry creates uncertainty as to whether an adult (or adult-looking teenager) is armed, and thus deters criminal attack for everyone. Open carry (where concealed carry is prohibited) deters criminal attack only for the person who is armed.

(Clayton Cramer's post, I think)
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
Re: I have, Don't now

gunsmoker said:
I do not carry openly as often now, not at all in the last few years. I just don't want to spook any sheeple. If I did, even though I may be legally in the right under the CURRENT LAW as it exists TODAY, a single episode of a soccer mom crying while being interviewed on TV about the "trauma" she experienced by seeing an armed civilian in a public place where she shops WITH HER CHILDREN, no less, by God, we must do something, if only for the sake of the children... she could get the legislators to amend the law and ban open carry in public places. I think they would do it. So my attitude is, don't give them an excuse to change the law and make it more restrictive.
The downside to this approach is the loss of the psychological influence of being exposed to respectable, peaceful, polite people carrying firearms who are not policemen. Your decision contributes to the overall view that somehow carry of a firearm is "weird" or otherwise bad, merely because it is so infrequently encountered (they do not see the concealed firearms).

If Soccer Mom saw open firearms every day, borne by respectable, clean cut persons such as yourself, she would not care so much.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,119 Posts
Re: I have, Don't now

Malum Prohibitum said:
If Soccer Mom saw open firearms every day, borne by respectable, clean cut persons such as yourself, she would not care so much.
Maybe he's scruffy lookin'.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,593 Posts
No I am the scruffy one. :D One of the guys at church calls me Osama bin *******
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
760 Posts
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
What gunsmoker said was what I meant by technically.

And it all comes down to trouble, not the law. (Odd for me to say that since I'm in law school, I guess I should be more precise in my language).

If I had my GFL I could walk outside of my apartment right now with my G21 on my hip and be legally in the right (and morally for that matter). However, the problem comes when the idiot soccer mom that lives next to me or any other number of people sees it on my hip. Phone calls would be made, complaints lodged in the apartment office, etc. Though unlikely, if someone tried to detain me because they though I was in the wrong I would have legal recourse against them. However, this all comes down to a matter of trouble. As one of my roommates says "Too many ignorant people, particularly in Atlanta."

Malum, I've read some 19th century cases where the courts upheld bans on concealed carry because it wasn't constitutionally protected and open carry hadn't been banned. I tend to agree with the logic there.

Don't get me wrong I'd love to open carry, all the time. I'm jealous of people in states where it is accepted, but I'm very trepiditious of doing it here. VERY.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,729 Posts
I'm not! :D

My only hestitation involves public gatherings. It would be a whole lot better if there were not so many places off limits. It is difficult to be bold if you have doubts as to whether you are violating some malum prohibitum law.
 
1 - 20 of 254 Posts
Top