Link to another aspect (?) of the caseWe hold that the core provisions of the New York and Connecticut laws prohibiting possession of semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines do not violate the Second Amendment, and that the challenged individual provisions are not void for vagueness. The particular provision of New York's law regulating load limits, however, does not survive the requisite scrutiny. One further specific provision-Connecticut's prohibition on the non-semiautomatic Remington 7615-unconstitutionally infringes upon the Second Amendment right. Accordingly, we AFFIRM in part the judgment of the District Court for the District of Connecticut insofar as it upheld the prohibition of semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, and REVERSE in part its holding with respect to the Remington. With respect to the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of New York, we REVERSE in part certain vagueness holdings, and we otherwise AFFIRM that judgment insofar as it upheld the prohibition of semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines and invalidated the load limit.
NPR - Supreme Court Takes 1st Gun Case In Nearly A Decade, Possibly With Big Consequences
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/22/6874...hare&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social
This is about legally registered guns in NYC. Your guns are consigned to the NYC limits. How is this any different than NYC claiming any legally owned vehicles registered in NYC can never go outside the city limits? Sounds like a "Berlin Wall" for guns.New York [City] bans transporting permitted handguns outside city lines, even if the gun is not loaded and is locked in a container. The guns currently can only be taken to the handful of shooting ranges within city limits.
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/DECA496973477C748525791F004D84F9/$file/10-7036-1333156.pdfBefore:GINSBURG, HENDERSON and KAVANAUGH,Circuit Judges.
Once the Second Amendment is extended beyond the home, public-carry bans generally will be the next to fall. Lower courts, now packed with pro-gun Trump nominees, will swiftly tear down restrictions on concealed and open carry. A central premise of Heller and McDonald-that the Second Amendment protects handguns "in the home"-will be cast aside. New York State Rifle will be the first shot in a coming constitutional revolution.
There are good answers to these questions. Right-to-carry laws, like those in Texas, appear to contribute to violent crime and increase homicide rates. Individuals carrying a weapon are more likely to escalate incidents of road rage and domestic conflicts into fatal shootings. Cities and states have a strong interest in curbing individuals' ability to bring deadly weapons into the streets.
SLATE was referencing that BS John Hopkins Opinion paper that has been debunked.Guys, your obsession for carry puts us all in danger. See?
We know. Slate is a ultra left wing radical Trump is the devil incarnate magazine that if you do not bow to their beliefs you are mentally defective and should be denied your excessive use of oxygen.SLATE was referencing that BS John Hopkins Opinion paper that has been debunked.
Only to the notation that Kavanaugh was one of the 3 on the original appellate review of Heller.Nemo, that second circuit case you linked above - it has nothing at all to do with this, does it? I spent all yesterday evening thinking that the S.Ct was taking up an "assault weapon ban" Second Amendment case.