So were they, Nurse Wubbels. So were they. That's why they took the route of cowardice and did nothing.
So were they, Nurse Wubbels. So were they. That's why they took the route of cowardice and did nothing.She described how she tried to get guards to intervene, saying that Payne seemed angry from the moment he arrived. In the video, university officers can be seen standing by as Payne violently arrests the nurse.
"I was scared to death," Wubbels said.
Provide a blood sampleOne story I read says she refused to provide a sample this one says she refused to let him draw blood. So which is it and did she physically try to stop him?
That's when you tell your Lt. "No." I did it more than once. Following orders is not really a defense when you are later sued.[Det. Jeff] Payne's defense is that his lieutenant, James Tracy, whom he spoke to by phone, had urged him to arrest her [for not cooperating with his efforts to obtain a blood sample]. Tracy eventually arrives at the scene in the extended video and appears to confirm that Payne acted on his instructions. Tracy also further berates Wubbels as she sits, handcuffed, in the police car.
You are forgetting about item 1.I think if he went to draw the sample and she interfered they might have a defense.
If on the other hand he told her to draw a sample for him, or give him a sample drawn for another reason, absent a court order, they don't have a leg to stand on. You can't order a person to perform an act they consider illegal and then arrest them for not doing it.
Plenty of cities and police departments are sued often enough to negate item 1. The individual officer might not be liable but the city is for his actionsYou are forgetting about item 1.
Again I think it falls into how she was "obstructing" him. If she was physically trying to stop him yes if she was refusing to comply with an order for an action on her part, like drawing blood, no. He can instruct her to move out of the way he can't tell her to draw blood without a court order."She's preventing me from getting/obtaining a blood sample, I can't do my job if she's obstructing me."
"If she's obstructing you, then she needs to be arrested."
Taxpayers get punished while criminal cops that break the law walk free.Plenty of cities and police departments are sued often enough to negate item 1. The individual officer might not be liable but the city is for his actions
AgreedTaxpayers get punished while criminal cops that break the law walk free.
He would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for that meddling EMTALA law!Seems planning on what patients to take where didn't won't work out for him either.
Nemo
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/09/05/utah-detective-who-dragged-nurse-fired-from-paramedic-job.html
I don't give a damn what he wanted. You're not assaulting my unconscious patient. Badge or no badge. The patient can't advocate for himself so that's what I have to do.I think if he went to draw the sample and she interfered they might have a defense.
If on the other hand he told her to draw a sample for him, or give him a sample drawn for another reason, absent a court order, they don't have a leg to stand on. You can't order a person to perform an act they consider illegal and then arrest them for not doing it.