Joined
·
75,268 Posts
Last I heard the NRA was being quiet about allowing carry on Univercities. The only thing they have supported publicly after the VT incident is more reporting of disqualifications. In fact I read an older article about the NRA supporting gun free zones, but they have not denounced or confirmed that is still there position after the shootings.Malum Prohibitum said:
Surely not the National Rifle Association! They luvs teh guns!Gunstar1 said:In fact I read an older article about the NRA supporting gun free zones, but they have not denounced or confirmed that is still there position after the shootings.
Sure, if they can ensure my security (in writing) no problem. If they can't they should know they will be liable should anything "bad" happen to me..Rammstein said:private firms should be allowed to control their own facilities.
I guess that's why they call it "concealed" carry. :wink:Rammstein said:If they are a private firm then you don't have to be there. It is your choice.
Exactly 8)jgullock said:I guess that's why they call it "concealed" carry
This is a good point. I would need to research more about the legal situation in Virginia to see how the colleges got away with this.GeorgiaGlocker said:It seems to me that any legislation to allow carry on College campuses would have to also include a ban on a College prohibiting them on formulating a policy on banning firearms on campus. What good is it to have the state to legalize carry on college campuses only to have a University block it with its own policy to prohibit firearms on campus. I realize that it would be a huge step in the right direction, but still a road block, nontheless, would remain. And getting policy changed at a univesity/college can/would be extemely difficult if not down right impossible.