oh my... soon they will have apache helicopters and A-10 Thunderbolts.
anic:
^someone who doesn't recognize incrementalism when it's presented to him."Armed" only with pepper spray, rubber buckshot, and other less-lethal tools.
quote from article above: "While they will be limited to “less than lethal†weapons, tear gas, tasers, rubber bullets and pepper spray could all be used in theory by the remote controlled flying machines."
If you only read the headline and not the article, you'd think Predator drones would be blasting suspects' cars off the road with Hellfire missiles.
The drones will be considered "sworn police officers" just like the K9s are. Your attempts at skeet shooting will therefore be considered assault on a police officer with all that that encompasses.Sound like an opportunity to improve my skeet skills.
It pushes the capability into three dimensions, which reduces accountability/traceability. For example, a drone could fire a .22 round at the top center of your skull from 1500 feet. No one would hear or see anything except you collapsing.How is this different from delivering explosives with a robot, like in Dallas?
500 yards is really pushing the envelope for .22LR. But that's another discussion.It pushes the capability into three dimensions, which reduces accountability/traceability. For example, a drone could fire a .22 round at the top center of your skull from 1500 feet. No one would hear or see anything except you collapsing.
Remember, you are shooting straight down where you have no vertical drop and the acceleration of gravity offsetting air resistance.500 yards is really pushing the envelope for .22LR.
Absolutely. You should see some of my son's aerial videography. Rock solid like a camera mounted on a pole.Is a drone capable of maintaining a perfectly stationary position long enough for that kind of accuracy?
Yes, they would. But for a bolt action or fixed breach gun, the motion begins after when the bullet exits the barrel and begins free flight on it's pre-exit trajectory.I would think that when the weapon is fired, the forces generated onto the drone structure would tend to move the drone out of its "perfect" position. I mean, there's nothing solid here.
Well that's a completely different perspective I've never heard of before.Remember, you are shooting straight down where you have no vertical drop and the acceleration of gravity offsetting air resistance.
That's what happens when you cross an engineer and a gun geek.Well that's a completely different perspective I've never heard of before.
My son regularly gets 1500+ feet vertical. And that's without the extended range antennas. At that altitude it is completely inaudible and almost impossible to spot if you didn't visually track it to it's present position.As an aside, what's the effective working range between a pilot and a drone
Skip that, they'll go for tact nukes in no time...imagine a tact nuke going off because your neighbor is growing a few weed plants.oh my... soon they will have apache helicopters and A-10 Thunderbolts.
anic:
All for the greater goodSkip that, they'll go for tact nukes in no time...imagine a tact nuke going off because your neighbor is growing a few weed plants.
Wrong. The firearm moves before the bullet exits the barrel.But for a bolt action or fixed breach gun, the motion begins after when the bullet exits the barrel and begins free flight on it's pre-exit trajectory.