I had read that one too, but it doesn't make much sense... there is no photo ID on my GFL so someone could steal it who could be described similarly (ie girly wrists and the like) and would never have to prove that they are the same person that is on the license... That means I could get replacement licenses for friends who are ineligible and they could carry unabated until there was a situation where they actually had to use their gun...Malum Prohibitum said:
Expedite what?legacy38 said:Unless you are driving a vehicle for which a license is required and upon a roadway you aren't required to have a driver's license.
I would personally advise that you have some form of picture ID to expedite things though.
Things :?AV8R said:Expedite what?legacy38 said:Unless you are driving a vehicle for which a license is required and upon a roadway you aren't required to have a driver's license.
I would personally advise that you have some form of picture ID to expedite things though.
Me, too. :wink:Wiley said:Not to go too far afield, when asked for identification by the poll worker I present my GFL and nothing else.
I am not sure how it would expedite things for me to hand over MORE of my stuff to one of "you guys."legacy38 said:I would personally advise that you have some form of picture ID to expedite things though.
I'll probably show my DL but as for my felonious friends that look similar to me that are RGFL holders...legacy38 said:Picture ID would more help assure the officer that the person standing or whatever before them is the person issued the GFL.
I thought GFLs didn't count as ID for something. Maybe I'm thinking of the TX CHL?Malum Prohibitum said:Me, too. :wink:Wiley said:Not to go too far afield, when asked for identification by the poll worker I present my GFL and nothing else.
One time I had to show them the statute, though. Only once.
Then the State should specify that the GFL has a picture on it. Not a fingerprint. However the State calls it identification and doesn't require a photo. If its good enough to vote then it should be good enough to walk around.legacy38 said:Picture ID would more help assure the officer that the person standing or whatever before them is the person issued the GFL.
Walk around all you want, but I'm just telling you that your far more likely to stand still for while with an officer than if you show a photo ID along with the GFL.ber950 said:Then the State should specify that the GFL has a picture on it. Not a fingerprint. However the State calls it identification and doesn't require a photo. If its good enough to vote then it should be good enough to walk around.legacy38 said:Picture ID would more help assure the officer that the person standing or whatever before them is the person issued the GFL.
The GFL is specifically listed as acceptable ID for voting purposes.budder said:I thought GFLs didn't count as ID for something. Maybe I'm thinking of the TX CHL?Malum Prohibitum said:Me, too. :wink:Wiley said:Not to go too far afield, when asked for identification by the poll worker I present my GFL and nothing else.
One time I had to show them the statute, though. Only once.
Considering that a utility bill is a good enough document to allow you to vote in Georgia, I wouldn't be holding that standard up as the benchmark. Personally, I completely disagree with courts on that one and think that a state issued picture ID, passport, or military ID should be the only documents acceptable, but that is an arguement for another time.ber950 said:Then the State should specify that the GFL has a picture on it. Not a fingerprint. However the State calls it identification and doesn't require a photo. If its good enough to vote then it should be good enough to walk around.legacy38 said:Picture ID would more help assure the officer that the person standing or whatever before them is the person issued the GFL.