Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner

1 - 20 of 122 Posts

·
Romans 10:13
Joined
·
4,637 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
When is the decision supposed to be rendered in this case?
 

·
Sledgehammer
Joined
·
4,777 Posts
The very last day upon which a decision can be made is July 16. This is the last day for decisions to be rendered in the January Term, which is the term in which this case was assigned. But, the court of appeals handles roughly 1,000 cases per term. Obviously, all of them can't be disposed of on the last day. A decision could come any day between now and July 16.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,267 Posts
Malum Prohibitum said:
In other words, folks, 60 days no mean 60 days . . .
:roll: :evil: :oops: :cry: :shakehead: :banghead: :bsflag: :help:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,591 Posts
rajl said:
WTF? Language seems very plain to me.
Not really. I want to read the opinion first, but I can see several ways the appeals court came to this decision. The law is very poorly written and overly complex (like most of GA's gun laws). Also we will have to see which standard the appeals court applied. The old law or the new law.

This one may have to be won in the Legislature. Virginia solved this problem by making the application your permit after 45 days.
 

·
Romans 10:13
Joined
·
4,637 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
ber950 said:
rajl said:
WTF? Language seems very plain to me.
Not really. I want to read the opinion first, but I can see several ways the appeals court came to this decision. The law is very poorly written and overly complex (like most of GA's gun laws). Also we will have to see which standard the appeals court applied. The old law or the new law.

This one may have to be won in the Legislature. Virginia solved this problem by making the application your permit after 45 days.
I tend to agree.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,139 Posts
The law needs to be changed, notwithstanding this particular decision, whichever way. Let's reserve judgment until we can read the opinion.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
68,872 Posts
ber950 said:
rajl said:
WTF? Language seems very plain to me.
Not really. I want to read the opinion first, but I can see several ways the appeals court came to this decision. The law is very poorly written and overly complex (like most of GA's gun laws). Also we will have to see which standard the appeals court applied. The old law or the new law.
After addressing the fact that the probate judge is not to issue to felons, the insane, and other not qualified individuals, the Court of Appeals turned its attention to the 60 day timeline. "The use of the term 'shall' means the probate court judge has no discretion to extend the 60-day timeline." You should think that would end the case. But the Court of Appeals instead declares a "quandary." It resolves this quandary by ignoring the language in the statute stating that no report is required and declaring that even the fact that no derogatory information is found requires a report!

The "appropriate report" must now be an "official, written evaluation of the candidate."

When no derogatory information is found on the applicant bearing on his or her eligibility to obtain a license or renewal license, a report shall not be required.

Some of you might recognize this as the Georgia Code. :wink:

That language has now been repealed as effectively as if the legislature did it! Here is what the Court of Appeals states.

The fact that the agency found no derogatory information on the applicant certainly bears on the applicant's eligibility; thus, it is a finding that must be "reported."
:?

The opinion is now posted on GCO.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
68,872 Posts
" . . . the 60 day period is implicitly extended by the statute itself when necessary to accomodate any delays that reasonably may be attributed to the investigative process."
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,591 Posts
After reading the ruling I must admit I am perplexed by the logic of the court. The only logic I see is the gun exception. Its about guns so we can't be too careful. :cry:
They gave no weight whatsoever to the 60 day clause. Frankly under this ruling I don't see a way to make a judge ever issue a license. That would make this state a defacto may issue state.

I think this is going to need a legislative fix. Without some penalty for going past the time limit this will always be a problem.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
68,872 Posts
ber950 said:
After reading the ruling I must admit I am perplexed by the logic of the court. The only logic I see is the gun exception. Its about guns so we can't be too careful.
Bingo! :lol:

ber950 said:
They gave no weight whatsoever to the 60 day clause.
Striaght out of the text of the opinion:
"The use of the term 'shall' means the probate court judge has no discretion to extend the 60-day timeline."

:rotfl:
 
1 - 20 of 122 Posts
Top