mb90535im said:
Obesity is a threat similar to that of the malnutrition that was encountered during WWII with incoming draftees and enlistees.
There are kids going to bed hungry in the US and the problem has gotten worse with this deep recession.
I doubt if generally speaking the kids going to bed hungry and the kids who are obese are one and the same although poverty does lend itself to more unhealthy diets in general.
Of course, since the First Lady is the one who said it it is obviously wrong and stupid, so don't take her word for it.
Ha, this is laughable. It must be true because CNN said it was! :lol: Do you really believe that if a child is starving in this country, the parents cannot find a way to feed them? There are soup kitchens all over the country, there is food stamps and welfare, and heck, if you just went out and asked any church out there to get your child a meal, they would do it. Heck our government will give you free housing, or government assisted HUD housing, they will give you food stamps so you can feed every single one of your children.
If one child is starving in this country, the richest country in the world, it is nothing but the parents fault for not giving a crap about their kids to get them food stamps, take them to a soup kitchen, or go to a church and ask a pastor or parishioners. This is completely absurd. The statistics on child hunger and starvation in this country have already been proved bullcrap and a lie, yet the media and politicians keep using those stats over and over again. I guess if you repeat a lie for long enough, people, such as yourself, will begin to believe it.
If a parent can truly not do anything to get their child fed, and nobody is taking care of a child, the state takes care of the child, and they will get plenty of food that way.
Our country is almost completely socialized. Are you really going to sit there and tell me that they do not take enough from the rich in this country and give back to the poor enough? My goodness, there are so many ways to get a child fed in this country if you are willing to go out and ask or go through government programs.
Secondly, it is kind of dumb for the 1st lady to say such a thing about "national security" when her husband has contributed to the biggest current national security threat. If she wants to start talking about threats to national security, maybe she should point the finger at her own husband for quadrupling our national debt in this country. That would be an excellent place to start.
I find the whole premise absolutely absurd.