Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner

Do you think the trio will be convicted?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Partial

  • Mcmichaels only

1 - 20 of 595 Posts

·
Member Georgia Carry
Joined
·
11,933 Posts
So why did they shoot an unarmed man? Did he lunge at them to try to get one of their guns?
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
This looks bad. The statement was that they were effecting an arrest, the deceased attacked them, so they shot him in self defense.

The citizen's arrest aspect bears some examination. Did they, or did they not, have probable cause to make an arrest, and, if so, for what offense?

I do not see anything in the news reports that could be used to construct probable cause.

Those are news reports, of course. Facts and evidence need to be examined.

Without probable cause, the men who attempted the arrest are simply committing crimes, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and attempted kidnapping.

In that case, the "attack" by the deceased is the act of self defense.

The shooting is not.

I am going to write a caveat here, and say that there could be lots of unreported facts and evidence that go into a decision to prosecute that are not being reported. I can comment only from what was reported, and I read all of the links above.
 

·
Man of Myth and Legend
Joined
·
15,399 Posts
Seems at least a criminal trespass was involved. I find it very difficult to believe walking through a house under construction is not criminal if no doors or windows.

Nemo

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...ia-2-months-ago-and-nobodys-been-arrested-yet

There's no evidence that Arbery was linked to any of the neighborhood's recent property crime. A family lawyer told NBC News he might've walked through the frame of the home that's under construction, though that's not a crime because there were no doors or windows.
 

·
NRA Instructor
Joined
·
3,391 Posts
Can we fully trust what the family lawyer tells the media what to put into the article or broadcast to be totally factual? From my experience when the building permit is pulled and placed in the box the property is restricted to only those authorized to be there and trespass notice is posted. So yes it is criminal trespass to be on a property that is under construction. It does not warrant the death penalty though.

I find it hard to believe there are not some undisclosed facts that are preventing the arrest and prosecution of the persons involved. I doubt (as in it's not likely) the "good 'o boy" system could be at play...
 

·
Lawyer and Gun Activist
Joined
·
28,608 Posts
"Burglary" of a building may require that the building be completed enough to serve as a shelter for goods. I don't know if it had to have doors or windows, but it certainly has to have a roof at least.

But burglary is not the only potential crime here. If somebody loiters around a construction site where they are building materials, it could quite possibly be reasonable to suspect that they are a thief intending to steal building materials- either to sell them use them directly or scrap them.

But, I am not aware of any authority for citizens to detain other private citizens and reasonable suspicion of a crime cops can do this because courts have eroded the constitution enough to give them this power, temporarily detaining people for questioning and investigation, but the courts have not given such power to citizens to use against each other.

A citizens arrest takes probable cause not a "reasonable suspicion."
 

·
Lawyer and Gun Activist
Joined
·
28,608 Posts
Question for debate:

If, in some areas purple people only make up a small percentage of the population, but they make up the suspects /arrestees in a majority of some classification of crimes (say, "thefts") ...

... is it legitimate for private citizens to consider this ---color profiling-- when evaluating whether or not they can intervene in what they think, but are not completely sure, a purple person is doing that type of crime (e.g. "theft")?
 

·
Lawyer and Gun Activist
Joined
·
28,608 Posts
Why does the Georgia NAACP call the father-son shooters "white supremacists" ??? Is there any evidence to support that?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,962 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,962 Posts
Question for debate:

If, in some areas purple people only make up a small percentage of the population, but they make up the suspects /arrestees in a majority of some classification of crimes (say, "thefts") ...

... is it legitimate for private citizens to consider this ---color profiling-- when evaluating whether or not they can intervene in what they think, but are not completely sure, a purple person is doing that type of crime (e.g. "theft")?
They do look a bit .................... suspicious, no?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Bkite

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
  • Like
Reactions: NTA

·
GeePeeDoHolic
Joined
·
6,418 Posts
From today's AJC

"Online support for shooting victim surges"
Metro, Monday, May 4, 2020, pp. B1, B4

I think someone needs an education on the GA carry laws.

Before sending the case to Durden, [District Attorney George] Barnhill said he saw no cause to arrest the McMichaels and that the men were legally justified in giving armed chase and using lethal force. In a letter to Glynn County police, Barnhill said the McMichaels were legally carrying their weapons - a shotgun and a .357 handgun - under Georgia's open carry law. Barnhill said they were entitled to pursue and detain Arbery under the state's provision that allows for citizen's arrest. He also said Travis McMichael was entitled to defend himself if he had been attacked.
"Pursue and detain" is only for felonies, isn't it?
 

·
Man of Myth and Legend
Joined
·
15,399 Posts
1 - 20 of 595 Posts
Top