Lawmaker wants faculty to carry

Malum Prohibitum · Dec 28, 2010

http://verdenews.com/main.asp?SectionID ... leID=39764

But Harper isn't stopping with arming the faculty. He is crafting a separate measure to allow students with certain training to also arm themselves.
Click to expand...

AV8R · Dec 28, 2010

Certain training...

Xiclotl · Dec 28, 2010

With the faculty and students disarmed and police at least minutes away, Harper said that has created "defense-free zones".
Click to expand...

"Defense-free zone". Much more truthful and accurate than "Gun-free zone".

BG_Atl · Dec 28, 2010

AV8R said:

Certain training...
Click to expand...

It appears that the "certain training" is no more than their standard permit required training...

Not everyone would be eligible. Harper's legislation would limit the right to those who have obtained a state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon.

That permit, which requires a background check and training, is no longer required for individuals to have weapons beneath a jacket or in a purse. But there are special privileges for those who do go through the permit process, such as being able to carry that weapon into a bar or a restaurant where alcoholic beverages are served.
Click to expand...

Not saying that I advocate mandatory training, but it's a good place to start at any rate...

commodore_dude · Dec 28, 2010

Hmm... I didn't realize AZ had a tiered system now...

rabbivj · Dec 28, 2010

commodore_dude said:

Hmm... I didn't realize AZ had a tiered system now...
Click to expand...

its similar to alaska's...Constitutional Carry for instate, permit for Reciprocity.

XDMWarrior · Dec 28, 2010

BG_Atl said:

AV8R said:

Certain training...
Click to expand...

It appears that the "certain training" is no more than their standard permit required training...

Not everyone would be eligible. Harper's legislation would limit the right to those who have obtained a state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon.

That permit, which requires a background check and training, is no longer required for individuals to have weapons beneath a jacket or in a purse. But there are special privileges for those who do go through the permit process, such as being able to carry that weapon into a bar or a restaurant where alcoholic beverages are served.
Click to expand...

Not saying that I advocate mandatory training, but it's a good place to start at any rate...
Click to expand...

You better take that statement back or the "No Training Nazis" here will cane whip you and brow beat you to death. Take it back, hurry before someone sees it.

commodore_dude · Dec 28, 2010

rabbivj said:

commodore_dude said:

Hmm... I didn't realize AZ had a tiered system now...
Click to expand...

its similar to alaska's...Constitutional Carry for instate, permit for Reciprocity.
Click to expand...

I got that part, but it sounds like permit holders get to carry in more places?

CoffeeMate · Dec 29, 2010

commodore_dude said:

rabbivj said:

[quote="commodore_dude":10nl5vlh]Hmm... I didn't realize AZ had a tiered system now...
Click to expand...

its similar to alaska's...Constitutional Carry for instate, permit for Reciprocity.
Click to expand...

I got that part, but it sounds like permit holders get to carry in more places?[/quote:10nl5vlh]
Wouldn't that be "permitless carry" rather than "Constitutional carry" since the right is infringed upon by designating off-limits locations?

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Lawmaker wants faculty to carry

Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

AV8R Banned

Xiclotl Active Member

BG_Atl Active Member

commodore_dude Active Member

rabbivj My Name is Inigo Montoya

XDMWarrior New Member

commodore_dude Active Member

CoffeeMate Junior Butt Warmer