[NTA]

 

[jsaund22]

 

[Craftsman]

Jury should have done a dramatic dive out of the line of fire.

 

[Schweisshund]

 

[NTA]

Hmmm, no verdict yet. Looks like a hung jury and more drama ahead. My wild guess.

 

[Savannah Dan]

 

[seajay]

My biggest question about the whole trial is...

Isn't the prosecutor obligated to be just as honest and truthful in his statements as everyone else is within the trial? The prosecutor told so many lies directly to the jury he should be jailed for perjury.

 

[Savannah Dan]

I totally agree with you 100% seajay.

 

[Montieth]

The thing about the Rittenhouse case that is lost on the left is this:

There are problems in the court system. The unfairness of the prosecution across a range of aspects are entirely unfair and run past the legal and constitutional bounds of our system's limit.

In the Rittenhouse case, there's clear ability to defend himself with a lot of money. This was due to donations. These will hopefully surmount the unfair stacking of the court.

It's easily argued that issues in the courts in the inner city that folks thow against the wall as 'racist' are just the same unfairness that we're seeing in this trial.

There's a lost opportunity for the left who might be reasonably arguing for more fair legal process to actually point to this case and get some real justice reform that pays attention to the rights of the accused while still carrying the interest of proper and right justice (vs retribution).

 

[phantoms]

Isn't the prosecutor obligated to be just as honest and truthful in his statements as everyone else is within the trial? The prosecutor told so many lies directly to the jury he should be jailed for perjury.

While lawyers are suppose to fight for their clients, the DA is suppose to fight for truth and the law. With some of the big cases over the last couple decades, that fact seems to have been lost.

 

[45_Fan]

The thing about the Rittenhouse case that is lost on the left is this:

There are problems in the court system. The unfairness of the prosecution across a range of aspects are entirely unfair and run past the legal and constitutional bounds of our system's limit.

In the Rittenhouse case, there's clear ability to defend himself with a lot of money. This was due to donations. These will hopefully surmount the unfair stacking of the court.

It's easily argued that issues in the courts in the inner city that folks thow against the wall as 'racist' are just the same unfairness that we're seeing in this trial.

There's a lost opportunity for the left who might be reasonably arguing for more fair legal process to actually point to this case and get some real justice reform that pays attention to the rights of the accused while still carrying the interest of proper and right justice (vs retribution).

Certainly not a broader fix but if granted it certainly bolsters your statements.

Jurors ask to review video evidence on second day of deliberations in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial

The jury deliberating in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial on Wednesday asked to review a series of videos that show the teenager fatally shooting two people and wounding another during last year's unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

www.cnn.com

If the DA takes this one on the teeth, this will either support the initial protests or involve some very complex gyrations to come up with “Miscarriage of justice but not THAT miscarriage of justice!”

 

[Schweisshund]

 

[Schweisshund]

Here is an op-ed by a so called "I had shotguns and hunted my whole life" expert on how he thinks Kyle was just a foolish little boy

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-hero-no-callow-175623840.html

He gives some fairly profound and wise advice ..."He should have stayed home"

Well, shouldn't the rioters and looters also stayed home?

 

[Savannah Dan]

I woke up this morning with a very sick feeling about this trial....

 

[45_Fan]

Here is an op-ed by a so called "I had shotguns and hunted my whole life" expert on how he thinks Kyle was just a foolish little boy

https://www.yahoo.com/news/kyle-rittenhouse-hero-no-callow-175623840.html

He gives some fairly profound and wise advice ..."He should have stayed home"

Well, shouldn't the rioters and looters also stayed home?

Man. That’s a very insulated perspective. I’ve got a neighbor that shot a prowler with a rifle when she was 14 and home alone. I don’t think she went looking for trouble anymore than Rittenhouse did. He said so on the stand. There are times you’ve done nothing wrong and trouble still comes knocking. Sometimes trouble wants to make a quick buck and other times trouble wants to “f**n kill you” or “empty the entire mag” in trouble’s own words…

 

[wee]

Dan I have the same feeling....I still have hope it's not guilty on every count but I get the feeling some will cave and vote guilty just to get the hell out of there. Any guilty verdict is a blow to the right of self defense.

Brian

 

[45_Fan]

In this week’s edition of sideshow justice…

Gun group to ‘award’ AR-15 to Kyle Rittenhouse – latest news

Kyle Rittenhouse verdict - live news and reaction

www.independent.co.uk

Just before noon, police announced the apprehension of a man who allegedly followed the jurors on a bus in an attempt to photograph them on Wednesday evening. The man allegedly claimed to be a producer with MSNBC.


Judge Bruce Schroeder responded by barring MSNBC from the courthouse for the remainder of the trial.

Anthony Chacon, 20, was booked on charges of felony bail jumping, misdemeanour bail jumping, battery, resisting and disorderly conduct, a Kenosha Police spokesperson confirmed to Fox News.
Mr Chacon was reportedly seen “body-slamming” a reporter and attacking a supporter of Mr Rittenhouse while wearing a T-shirt which read: “F**k Kyle.” The bail-jumping charges indicate Mr Chacon has a previous criminal record, the details of which are unknown.

I can’t wait to hear how body slamming was provoked. Are we going to have a narrative that the reporter “went looking for trouble” too?

 

[gunsmoker]

I'm pretty sure Kyle will be acquitted for shooting the first guy, the **** child molester, who had previously threatened to kill him and was enraged and attacking him (although barehanded.)
It's never a good idea to use a gun against a single person who attacks you with no weapons, but since this guy had made death threats and since he was effectively part of a larger group of communist agitators who were violent and were upset that Kyle was putting out the arson fires that they've started.... I say it will be an acquittal on this count.

 

[gunsmoker]

Ok, so we can't call a homosexual paedophile
a H-O-M-O ????

Gee, thanks GaPacking, for signing up to enforce the politically correct speech of the leftists.

 

[gunsmoker]

I think he's in more danger of getting convicted for shooting the other two communists who have claimed (or others have claimed on their behalf) that they were trying to use force to detain what they believed was a murderer escaping the scene of the crime.