Written just to piss off the liberals. Probably not but it has that effect. Love it.
The link in post #19 has a video with Miller, the plaintiff, an attorney, as one of the guests.And more alarms are sounding in CA.
Who has read the opinion? PDF link below.
California officials are pushing back after a federal judge in San Diego overturned the state’s 32-year ban on assault weapons, and in doing so, compared the type of gun to a Swiss Army knife.www.foxnews.com
Let me go mark a calendar for 2025 so we can get the 9th’s opinion that they need to rehear it en banc (by 2030). Whee!CA AG appeals this "shocking" ruling.
It is clear the state's top leaders were not happy with U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez's ruling that the state’s definition of illegal military-style rifles unlawfully deprives law-abiding Californians of weapons commonly allowed in most other states and by the U.S. Supreme Court.www.fox5atlanta.com
Getting Miller to the Supreme Court will be equally important, as that case concerns much more than the question of the constitutionality of “assault weapon” bans: It squarely presents an issue dividing the circuit courts, the appropriate standard for reviewing laws that affect Second Amendment rights. Here, Benitez’s 94-page opinion provides a perfect primer for Americans seeking to understand both the law and the fallacies pushed by politicians and the press to justify infringements on Second Amendment rights.
Long, but worth reading. Thanks for sharing, Nemo.Good "discuss with uninformed" analysis. I see no reason SCOTUS will not hear it. Unless the 9th upholds it.
Judge Roger Benitez’s opinion provides a perfect primer for Americans seeking to understand the law and the gun fallacies leftists push.thefederalist.com