Your understanding of the law in this regard is correct.
The key phrase is "based only on a sign"I agree that it is an oversimplification to say that signs carry "no legal weight." That said, I also agree that the element of notice based only on a sign is problematic for a prosecution.
(Quotes from previous discussions, which link to their threads.)Is a sign notice? Did the person see it? Did the person knowingly ignore it? Is a "No Firearms" sign prohibiting entry? The owner providing notice is not the same thing as a person receiving notice.
I've had people in front of me hold the door open for us as we enter. Only upon leaving did I notice any sign. How is that "notice"?From the EF Hutton of this board:
jrm said: ↑
I agree that it is an oversimplification to say that signs carry "no legal weight." That said, I also agree that the element of notice based only on a sign is problematic for a prosecution.
Many times those "no firearms" signs are buried in the mass of other signs indicting store hours, no smoking allowed, what credit cards are accepted, etc. How many of us really pay any attention to that? Did we really receive notice?Rugerer said: ↑
Is a sign notice? Did the person see it? Did the person knowingly ignore it? Is a "No Firearms" sign prohibiting entry? The owner providing notice is not the same thing as a person receiving notice.
Is that wording Law or what it could be. Does the business owner have the authority to make it Criminal Trespassing on his own or does the State mandate the wording?I suspect courts would be reluctant to find "notice" that A PERSON MUST NOT ENTER the property when the sign doesn't say anything about people entering or remaining, but only forbids a certain tool or an activity (carrying the tool).
A sign that said "PERSONS IN POSSESSION OF FIREARMS ARE NOT ALLOWED ON THIS PROPERTY. Entry is Criminal Trespassing"
might have a better chance of being seen as legally sufficiently notice.
"receiving notice" is not defined. However, looking you in the eye and stating "Leave!" would most assuredly constitute notice.Is that wording Law or what it could be. Does the business owner have the authority to make it Criminal Trespassing on his own or does the State mandate the wording?
Or is the whole mess up to the good Graces of whatever Judge one would stand before.