If a neighbors tree falls on your property
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Joined
·
19,386 Posts
If they were nice they would clean it up.
But I think this falls under the "act of God."
If you noticed it was dead, told them in writing and then it fell they would be responsible.
But I think this falls under the "act of God."
If you noticed it was dead, told them in writing and then it fell they would be responsible.
Joined
·
1,062 Posts
No Damage=Free Firewood.
If there is damage, someones insurance company is getting a call.
If there is damage, someones insurance company is getting a call.
Joined
·
1,311 Posts
If you have writen proof that you notified your neighbor that the tree could fall on your property then the responsibility would be theirs to remove and repair any damages.
If you have not done this then you just became the lucky owner of part of a tree.
If you have not done this then you just became the lucky owner of part of a tree.
Joined
·
11,977 Posts
I have a pretty good understanding of what the answer is due to a similar situation I experienced:
- If the tree was visibly diseased, rotted or dead, it's the neighbor's liability.
- If the tree had no visible signs of disease, rot or death, it's your liability.
- If the tree was visibly diseased, rotted or dead, it's the neighbor's liability.
- If the tree had no visible signs of disease, rot or death, it's your liability.
Joined
·
29,273 Posts
F'kin A.
:up: is correct.
In urban and suburban areas, land owners are supposed to keep an eye on their trees for signs of disease, weakness, erosion around the roots, etc.
But if the tree "looked O.K." to the untrained eye of an average person, it's not negligence just because a storm blows it down, or it falls for some other unforseen reason.
And it's not a case of "strict liability" either.
You can always submit a claim on your insurance, but don't expect the neighbor or their insurance company to willingly pay a claim or pay for the cleanup.
(In the last 2 years, I've been on both sides of this. My trees falling, and neighbors' trees falling on my stuff.)
:up: is correct.
In urban and suburban areas, land owners are supposed to keep an eye on their trees for signs of disease, weakness, erosion around the roots, etc.
But if the tree "looked O.K." to the untrained eye of an average person, it's not negligence just because a storm blows it down, or it falls for some other unforseen reason.
And it's not a case of "strict liability" either.
You can always submit a claim on your insurance, but don't expect the neighbor or their insurance company to willingly pay a claim or pay for the cleanup.
(In the last 2 years, I've been on both sides of this. My trees falling, and neighbors' trees falling on my stuff.)
This is correct. I also had a situation where the top half of a neighbor's tree, that looked fine, fell on my lot. Turns out it was eaten up with carpenter ants. That 1/2 of the tree was my problem, but at my insurance's behest, I sent them a letter describing the situation. At this point, if the rest of the tree fall on my property, it will be their problem. Sort of 'in the middle' of the two extremes you listed above.Mrs_Esterhouse said:
Joined
·
4,447 Posts
this is good to know information guys. thanks for explaining this. I have 2 trees that look in great shape, but termites in our area run rampant and have killed several trees in the area. We plan to have these cut down asap to avoid any issues, nothing like having a 60foot pine tree fall on the pool or fence 
Joined
·
19,386 Posts
If those trees are pines then they were likely killed by pine beetles.Tippin said:
Joined
·
46,427 Posts
"If a neighbors tree falls on your property..."
And here I thought this was going to be some sort of Zen question.
:lol:
And here I thought this was going to be some sort of Zen question.
:lol:
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Join the discussion
