Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Off-topic' started by mark5019, Dec 11, 2010.
He "thought" the man was trying to take the officer's gun? For a fatal shooting I would expect a little better explanation than "I thought." Perhaps a taser would have been a better option?
I'd agree that the explanation reads weakly.
But if someone actually does go for the officer's service weapon, I would not expect to see the response limited to only less lethal options.
An attempted disarming should be answered w/ lethal force.
Fighting with ANY cop will end up bad for those involved.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes...
I would agree that on the surface it does seem that there could have been more options (less lethal) available, but this is a *NEWS* report which really equates to "tell what sells".