What's sad is that if the guy had gotten hired and attempted the same kind of deception against a citizen, they would have defended him, put him on paid leave, etc.
:screwy: :lol:Officials said the man was at State Patrol Headquarters on October 6 being interviewed for a civilian management job when a State Patrol employee saw a book titled "How to Beat the Lie Detector" on a seat in the car parked next to hers.
The job candidate was inside the office undergoing a polygraph exam at the time, and officials said they determined that the car and book were his.
So either they admit that the Polygraph is a flawed device or they discriminated against the applicant for his choice of reading material.Xiclotl said:http://www.komonews.com/news/local/104788389.html
:screwy: :lol:Officials said the man was at State Patrol Headquarters on October 6 being interviewed for a civilian management job when a State Patrol employee saw a book titled "How to Beat the Lie Detector" on a seat in the car parked next to hers.
The job candidate was inside the office undergoing a polygraph exam at the time, and officials said they determined that the car and book were his.
Ill second that. How about the hypocrisy here. How many times have you heard here that guns arent dangerous, its the people who use them for the wrong reasons who are. But reading a book on beating a lie detector test immediately makes you a jack booted thug in training? Why not apply the same mentality here as towards guns: its not the knowledge, its how you use it that makes it good or bad.phantoms said:What's to say that he wasn't just nervous about a polygraph in general (as most people are) and trying to find comfort in a book that tells what a polygraph looks for.