Joined
·
75,247 Posts
That is not my comment.http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=65021&highlight=ayoobian
Here, many gun defense theories he states as legal horrors are shown to be nothing but unsubstantiated garbage.
That is not my comment.http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=65021&highlight=ayoobian
Here, many gun defense theories he states as legal horrors are shown to be nothing but unsubstantiated garbage.
I am not trying to "scare" anybody into anything. All I am sharing with you is what I read from one of Massad Ayoob's columns. You can take this opinion that he shared and do what ever you want with it. I happen to think that he is the best gunwriter and self defense expert in the country. I believe most of what he writes.Rammstein said:This is just something that gun owners like to use to scare other gun owners into conformity.
I know you didn't intend to "scare" anyone, but the gun community has a problem with circulating bad information sometimes.Doc Holliday said:I am not trying to "scare" anybody into anything. All I am sharing with you is what I read from one of Massad Ayoob's columns. You can take this opinion that he shared and do what ever you want with it. I happen to think that he is the best gunwriter and self defense expert in the country. I believe most of what he writes.Rammstein said:This is just something that gun owners like to use to scare other gun owners into conformity.
So this guy believes that Ayoob lies about all of the cases that he has had first hand knowledge of? Ayoob is lying about being called to the stand as an expert witness? I don't think so....Malum Prohibitum said:That is not my comment.http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=65021&highlight=ayoobian
Here, many gun defense theories he states as legal horrors are shown to be nothing but unsubstantiated garbage.
http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/2005/08 ... ility.htmlMassad Ayoob; certainly the countries premier expert witness on self defense shootings; has performed an extensive study of self defense shootings in which handloads were involved, and he has found that:
1. while your likliehood of being demonized by prosecutors is very high; that would be the case anyway, and that basing that demonization on ammo choice is a weak strategy for the prosecutor because this argument can be asily turned around on them by competent counsel and expert witnesses
2. Use of handloads in a self defense shooting seems to have no effect on your liklihood of conviction
There is one thing that WAS a definite negative, in that Ayoob found that the use of handloads made if FAR more likely that prosecutors would decide to charge you in the first place, and that a grand jury would return a true bill of indictment (as lawyers are wont to say however, a good prosecutor could indict a ham sandwhich).
Although I don't disagree with you conclusions, I will stick to factory loads for my carry. In the first case it is not the fact that it is not a self defense shooting it is that the court didn't take his word that he had handloads in the firearm and they tested another load. I think the case that Ayoob is trying to make is that could happen to a shooter in a self defense case.Rammstein said:So from the article we know the following:
1. The first case is not a self defense situation, so it is irrelevant to the discussion of using handloads for self defense.
2. This basically sums up the second story: "Long story short-officer was acquitted"
The conclusion is that no case has been provided that using reloads will result in a criminal conviction. Also, even if the officer was convicted one person is not a statistically significant number to worry people about using handloads.
I don't think he was accusing you af anything. Rather, he was attacking the "conventional wisdom" regarding handloads.Doc Holliday said:I am not trying to "scare" anybody into anything.
I don't think he was accusing you af anything. Rather, he was attacking the "conventional wisdom" regarding handloads.Malum Prohibitum said:[quote="Doc Holliday":60rnqigc]I am not trying to "scare" anybody into anything.
Me, too.Doc Holliday said:I will stick to factory loads for my carry.
Me, too.Malum Prohibitum said:[quote="Doc Holliday":32hctkc0]I will stick to factory loads for my carry.
Thanks!Rammstein said:If you eject the cartridge quickly, then yes it is completely normal.jccls said:Is it just mine, or do other glocks leave a noteworthy scratch on the edge of the shell when it is ejected? (I usually see it on the edge that meets the lead.)
Upgraded from Glock to H&K . . .Doc Holliday said:. . . but "upgraded" from Glock to Sig. :lol:
Upgraded from Glock to H&K . . .Malum Prohibitum said:[quote="Doc Holliday":1754h1mm] . . . but "upgraded" from Glock to Sig. :lol:
Upgraded from Glock to H&K . . .USMC - Retired said:[quote="Malum Prohibitum":yqhhqkaq][quote="Doc Holliday":yqhhqkaq] . . . but "upgraded" from Glock to Sig. :lol:
Upgraded from Glock to H&K . . .USMC - Retired said:[quote="Malum Prohibitum":a33wii21][quote="Doc Holliday":a33wii21] . . . but "upgraded" from Glock to Sig. :lol: