No. It moves the license requirements to 126. So it it still 21 or 18 (if in the military) for a license.Am I reading this correctly by interpreting it to say that it would be unlawful for any individual under 21 years to carry without a license, but also removes the age requirement to acquire a license?
So for anyone who is ineligible for a license due to age, all this does is remove their ability to carry a long gun. Seems like this will need some amendments and cleanup if it is to have any hope of passing.No. It moves the license requirements to 126. So it it still 21 or 18 (if in the military for a license).