Please make no mistake about it. Immigration and refugee policies of the current bogus administration are being used as weapons to destroy America. Nothing more and nothing less. Joe Biden, his ilk and his puppet masters are attempting to put the very last nail in the coffin of what was the greatest Nation this world has ever known heretofore. He and they are truly, unarguably, Enemies Foreign and Domestic.
Biden Axing Trump’s Border Security: 25,000 Migrants Entering U.S.
I have not read his comments to be divisive at all. However, I do read your comments to be divisive. Perhaps you should reflect on the events that lead up to The Capitol Riots. What possibly could have caused it? Could it have possibly been the divisive (and hateful) rhetoric aimed at President Trump and his supporters for the 4 years he was in office? Could it possibly be that the Democrats so boldly stole the election right in front of the faces of 80+ million voters?Actually they do. They weren’t posted for you though. If you’d rather me write to you as an audience, I’d ask you directly where you are in your own headspace. You, not-a-Georgia resident, came to a Georgia 2A forum and started a topic of certain unmistakable verbiage in the wake of events on January 6th. Events that have brought both traditionally conservative groups and their communication methods under increased scrutiny. To further that, in the opening salvo, you then label the President so very specifically:
Following that opening, you have, over and over again, posted messages of divisive (even within conservative communities) nationalistic rhetoric without meaningful contribution to, or even commentary on, our current political efforts to preserve and expand 2A rights in Georgia. It leaves me questioning your goals here. Are you looking to run off new potential 2A allies? Are you looking to sow discord amongst 2A advocates and fracture solidarity? Are you looking to bring down enough additional scrutiny to neuter the usefulness of this virtual town square as we debate enhancements of current legislation? Or worse yet, are you just truly unaware that these are all the fruits of your labor in this place? Seriously, what is your purpose here?
You were shown evidence of fraud. I think a better question would be "How can a Republic exist when evidence of fraud is dismissed and/or ignored by corrupt officials?"You would have others believe, in blind faith even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, in such a narrative? How can a republic even exist when a core belief of any losing side in any election is “this is fraud” and “this means war”?
You haven't been able to back up any of your fraudulent claims liar.I was shown conspiracy theories and allegations that, as of yet, you have failed to actually provide credible evidence to support.
10 4. I think I have already made my position quite clear and will not continue to repeat it.This is not the voting fraud or not thread. Nothing in this thread suggesting that America, Her Sovereignty and the future of our freedoms are under purposeful, consistent and, as of now very successful attempts, to destroy this nation is untrue. Bickering back and forth would get it locked by the moderators when they say is enough and that will happen so please stay on topic. Please.
It was legal during the third reich to harass Jewish business owners. Are you saying that the Republicans you are mentioning would harass Jewish Business owners if it were legal?So you really can't lay out a logical argument why we shouldn't have unrestricted immigration if it were legal. Your initial argument against immigration was "its illegal." So I asked if it were legal would you suypport it and you answered No. So your objection is not the legality of the situation. But you won't say what your actual objection is.
Anyone engaging in a civil argument should have reasons to back his position. A shame you don't.
It wasn't putting any words in your mouth and I apologize if you felt offended by my line of questioning. It was you that brought up the "legality" argument and I was just using a historical example that we are all aware of to illustrate that no one here would be harassing a Jewish Business Store Owner during the Third Reich even though it was legal to do so.None of that really has anything to do with immigration now, does it? How about stick to the topic. Oh, and if you wouldn't mind not putting words in my mouth, that would be great too.
And in fact you introduced the distinction between legal and illegal immigration. And you never answerede the question: if legality is simply a vote and stroke of the pen then why would you oppose unrestricted immigration if it were legal?
I think you are mistaken. I was responding to the post you made bringing up the illegal vs. Legal comparison.First you raised the legal vs illegal argument, not me. Second you are confusing private property (your house) with public property (this country). They aren't remotely similar. Third you confuse a malum in se (breaking into my house--an actual offense) with a malum in prohibition ( coming across the border). No one is hurt by a border crossing.
We could make border crossing legal tomorrow (as it was on the Mexican border until the 1950s). We could not make house breaking legal.
Is there a difference between legal and illegal immigration? I believe there is. From your answer, you believe the laws regulating immigration are racist. So ...anyone enforcing those laws are also a racist.Your post #70:
There is a difference between illegal
immigration and legal immigration.
You brought up the distinction.
As for public property: you could object when teenagers go into your backyard to play ball. But do you object when they go onto a city park to do so
That is why I brought up the Third Reich Laws and the legal aspect of harassing Jewish business owners.Its not that I think such laws are racist. Its a fact that the history of immigration laws in this country are based on racism. That's just historical truth. I would argue its true today as well.
Your point about people enforcing them being racist is entirely your own projection. I never said anything like that.
As to your scenario of kids committing illegal acts, you make my point. We punish people when they commit crimes not because they might do so. Same with immigrants. If they rob or murder you punish them. Same with gun owners. If they misuse the gun you punish them. But you don't punish them because they might do so.
Argh! Why does the forum edit out the word N e groes ???This is a direct quote from a Supreme Court case (again), not a racist rant by me.
They think they are invisible too.... If you don't understand that then you're just a useful idiot and apologist for the left and Marxism.
Kind of like Michelle Obama?Anyone who can't engage intelligently needs to shut the 🔇 up, regardless of his opinion.
I have no idea if he is or not.I had no idea she was a member here.
My grandfather killed a lot of Nazis in WWII. So did his brother.It's what happens when you get group-think and piling on. It's a Gresham's Law of discussion forums: bad discussion drives out good. With people revealing themselves as jew-hating conspiracy nuts unable to engagew in reasonable debate it forces out those who are capable of it.