Very slight evidence indeed. Can you imagine how the cross examination of the government witness (the police officer?) went at the hearing? The officer would not be able to identify the drug involved or the drug activity engaged in.Malum Prohibitum said:Testimony that I think is "slight" evidence under the relevant precedent for a statute that requires a preponderance of the evidence showing substantial connection to drug activity.
AND - it looks like he flew to Chicago and was driving back to California when stopped in Nebraska. Did he forget to pick up the drugs, or did he fly the drugs to Chicago and was coming back to California with the money?