Unreal, this isn't the first thing I've seen like this. Not happy about this at all.
And yet you vote for an open borders advocate.Unreal, this isn't the first thing I've seen like this. Not happy about this at all.
That's a lie, its already been debunked on this website countless times, Johnson is not for open borders.And yet you vote for an open borders advocate.
He's in love with multiculturalism and diversity. Both of which are open borders trademarks. Ask the Europeans how multiculti and diversity are working out for them. Assimilation will never work when your intended demographic wants to reclaim "their" land. LaRaza, Aztlan and MECha ring a bell?That's a lie, its already been debunked on this website countless times, Johnson is not for open borders.
Practical Reform. No Walls. Incentivize Assimilation.
No argument from me.Plus, I am for completely doing away with the welfare state, so what now?
That is not open borders like Hilary, you proved it yourself, all he's for is reviewing and changing the Visa system. That's for work.He's in love with multiculturalism and diversity. Both of which are open borders trademarks. Ask the Europeans how multiculti and diversity are working out for them. Assimilation will never work when your intended demographic wants to reclaim "their" land. LaRaza, Aztlan and MECha ring a bell?
https://www.johnsonweld.com/immigration
You can dress it up any way you want and say it's not the same as what X or Y is proposing but in the end it's still open borders advocacy.That is not open borders like Hilary, you proved it yourself, all he's for is reviewing and changing the Visa system. That's for work.
That is easily disproved in two minutes using GoogleYou can dress it up any way you want and say it's not the same as what X or Y is proposing but in the end it's still open borders advocacy.
You are correct. Lip flap does not truth make.You can dress it up any way you want and say it's not the same as what X or Y is proposing but in the end it's still open borders advocacy.
Nobody here is dumb enough to believe your lies. We have goggle and the internet now.You are correct. Lip flap does not truth make.
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Gary_Johnson_Immigration.htmMake work visas as easy as possible
Q: What about work visas?
JOHNSON: Look, if you're in the country illegally, come on in, get your work visa, as long as you've been law-abiding, we'll give you the work visa, and let's start make it easy to distinguish from a Border Patrol standpoint the difference between bad people that are crossing illegally and the woman with her kids who knows there are jobs in El Paso, but she's got to wade across the Rio Grande with her kids to get that job.
Q: But that would also be considered illegal.
JOHNSON: It is. Yes, it is.
Q: From a compassionate standpoint, I get the distinction. But from a legal one?
JOHNSON: Make it as easy as possible for her to get a work visa so that the line is moving to get across the border. And if she's gotten across the border already and she's held a job, look, come on in, get a work visa. Let's dot the i's and cross the t's on your being here legally. And I'm not even talking about being a citizen. Citizenry will still be a process.
Source: CNN Libertarian Town Hall: joint interview of Johnson & Weld , Jun 22, 2016
First, Google is not exactly an unbiased source as has been shown by their manipulation of search results.That is easily disproved in two minutes using Google
Yes, Google is a paragon of virtue and truth. Much like most of what you post.Nobody here is dumb enough to believe your lies. We have goggle and the internet now.
Oh boo, hoo, hoo. Poor Paloma got all wet crossing the Rio Grande.Make work visas as easy as possible
http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Gary_Johnson_Immigration.htmQ: What about work visas?
JOHNSON: Look, if you're in the country illegally, come on in, get your work visa, as long as you've been law-abiding, we'll give you the work visa, and let's start make it easy to distinguish from a Border Patrol standpoint the difference between bad people that are crossing illegally and the woman with her kids who knows there are jobs in El Paso, but she's got to wade across the Rio Grande with her kids to get that job.
Q: But that would also be considered illegal.
JOHNSON: It is. Yes, it is.
Q: From a compassionate standpoint, I get the distinction. But from a legal one?
JOHNSON: Make it as easy as possible for her to get a work visa so that the line is moving to get across the border. And if she's gotten across the border already and she's held a job, look, come on in, get a work visa. Let's dot the i's and cross the t's on your being here legally. And I'm not even talking about being a citizen. Citizenry will still be a process.
Source: CNN Libertarian Town Hall: joint interview of Johnson & Weld , Jun 22, 2016
Work Visas are not open borders
I concur. Certain types of self proclaimed truthful intellectuals point out that a large percentage of illegal, by definition, criminal aliens, in the US are those who overstayed visas. Therefore the argument for a wall is ridiculous to them. So give out more work visas get more overstaying. More illegals. More people who will qualify and receive tax payer funded handouts. They really are silly, funny and .....We don't owe work visas to anybody.
False equivocation. They are also "trademarks" of a university campus, but Johnson isn't running for university chancellor.He's in love with multiculturalism and diversity. Both of which are open borders trademarks.
If you actually believed this, you would not have made your last 862 posts.Lip flap does not truth make.
They are also trademarks for many "religious" organizations but Johnson isn't running for Pope either.False equivocation. They are also "trademarks" of a university campus, but Johnson isn't running for university chancellor.
Like I said somewhere else on one of these threads, when you make a point it's "truth" but when someone else makes a point it's a "lie."Facts are facts, just because they don't match up with your lies don't mean that they aren't true.