yup. failure to obey an officer's commands or making any sudden movements with your hands is a death sentence now :-(
Link to updated story w/ dashcam video:After careful consideration and review of a video recording of the shooting, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Davidson, we conclude that a reasonable officer in Hancock's position would have feared for his life.
I tend to agree and I am still annoyed that it has received so little coverage.Bad shoot. I have nothing else to say. Watch the video for yourself. Bad shoot.
Unless the audio and video are not properly synchronized in the version of the video available at the link in the first post, the Eleventh Circuit's description of the events shown in the video at the time of the shooting are inaccurate.If you are interested, here is the opinion from the 11th Circuit.
http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unpub/files/201610857.pdf
i think your version of the moral of the story leaves a lot to be desiredI didn't see this posted anywhere and if not for being related to one of the attorneys representing the Airman, I don't know that I would have ever heard about it.
Long story short, person (Davidson) got out of his car holding (excuse me...brandishing) his wallet and after "refusing" to comply with the officer, was shot once in the abdomen. On appeal to the US Ct of Appeals, the court found that...
Link to updated story w/ dashcam video:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...waving-wallet-graphic-video-article-1.2995182
Moral of the story: Keep your damn hands where they can be seen!
A couple of things that bug me. One: After the officers obviously determine that they shot an unarmed man, they did NOTHING to render aid. That seems to be REALLY f*ed up in my mind. And two: I wonder if this would have gotten more (any!) publicity had Davidson been a black man?
Bad shoot. I have nothing else to say. Watch the video for yourself. Bad shoot.
If what I saw in the video allows 'reasonable officers' to justifiably kill citizens, officers and judges should quit bitching about the citizenry holding their professions with such low regard."After careful consideration and review of a video recording of the shooting, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Davidson, we conclude that a reasonable officer in Hancock's position would have feared for his life," the three-judge panel wrote in the ruling.
Perhaps, but how do you fight a system that is rigged against you? To be honest, I feel pretty powerless.i think your version of the moral of the story leaves a lot to be desired
I thought that too. Even more annoying is that this didn't even make it to trial. I'm not sure if a jury would agree with the trial court AND the appeals court.Unless the audio and video are not properly synchronized in the version of the video available at the link in the first post, the Eleventh Circuit's description of the events shown in the video at the time of the shooting are inaccurate.
The entire purpose of immunity is to keep the case from a jury.I thought that too. Even more annoying is that this didn't even make it to trial. I'm not sure if a jury would agree with the trial court AND the appeals court.
Not a very good moral at all. Davidson's hands were clearly visible as he was trying to push his way out of a canted vehicle. Contrary to the cop's comment, Davidson didn't quickly jump out of the car. A better moral might be to not exit your vehicle with anything in your hands lest the king's agent fears for his life.Moral of the story: Keep your damn hands where they can be seen!
That's normally a very good point. Where in this incident didn't Davidson attempt to comply with the cop's command? Davidson's mistake was having something (his wallet?) in his hands which Officer Quickshot confused for a gun.When you do not comply with an officers commands, you should expect to get shot.
Something else I wonder is how clear were the cop's instructions? Sure, it sounded loud and clear over the microphone, but with Davidson a good distance away and traffic nearby (not only to mention being blinded by the spotlight from the cop's car) I would imagine it wasn't clear at all.That's normally a very good point. Where in this incident didn't Davidson attempt to comply with the cop's command? Davidson's mistake was having something (his wallet?) in his hands which Officer Quickshot confused for a gun.
simple. stop supporting it.Perhaps, but how do you fight a system that is rigged against you? To be honest, I feel pretty powerless.
I'm hard on law enforcement. I'm also their biggest supporter. I dispute that "they have completely lost the faith of the public". and it's not just the code of silence, it's the district attorneys and FEDERAL JUDGES that are making excuses for this kind of behavior. They are all complicit.I still maintain that a lot more officers are going to be shot in the line of duty due to instances like this. They have completely lost the faith of the public and until they learn to clean up their own back yard when they do wrong, this will get out of hand. Lying for a fellow officer that should be kicked off of the force is wrong and needs to be stopped.