http://www.ammoland.com/2010/10/20/clev ... itter-end/
Why is it always the most dangerous cities in America that cling to gun control? Or am I placing the chicken before the egg here?Cleveland has taken the position that Ohio cannot guarantee broad exercise of constitutional rights. Instead, what is required is a micro-management of each element of the exercise of the right. This argument is nonsense on stilts. Clevelandâ€™s argument, by analogy, is that there is no freedom of speech unless the state regulates exactly when, where and how a person speaks and criminally punishes anyone who does not speak according to these regulations.
It is extremely illustrative of Clevelandâ€™s attitude towards their citizens that Cleveland feels that the only role government may play is restricting freedoms, rather than broadly guaranteeing freedoms.