I took all the 9/11 questions to my father, an engineer, that builds nuclear facilities for a living. He knows a lot about things, such as reinforced concrete, how long it would take for a fire to weaken steel to the point where weight applied to it would cause it to fail, and a bunch of other things, such as nuclear bombs and their effect on structures, I mean some of the stuff he knows is beyond what happened at the World Trade Centers.
I asked him about the fire and the building, and the damage caused to it by the planes, and he said that it was definitely possible for the fuel, office fire to get hot enough to weaken the steel, especially when the howling winds that are present at such heights make the hole in the building, which essentially acts as a KILN. He also told me that the way the building fell was exactly how he would have expected it. Once a few floors' steel failed, the weight of all the above floors falling on floors below it would pancake exactly as we saw. I asked him about this years ago, so I forget all the specifics he gave me, but he said it was possible, and even gave me specific facts such as temperatures and the effect of wind on fire, physics. I believe him, and expert.
The problems that I have with 9/11 was that NORAD stood down, Cheney gave the order for the stand down, and supposedly the exact same scenario was being "practiced" at the exact same time 9/11 was taking place.
I think the building was damaged in the exact way it was said it did, and I believe it came down the exact way they said it did.
I just find some of the other strange things that happened that day to be completely fishy. Especially, a strange report on the news that I saw on 9/11 that said the last plane had been shot down by a jet, then a fighter pilot actually received a medal where he talked about shooting down the plane, and then I never heard another word about that on the news. Not to mention eye witnesses say they saw the jet as well. Next thing that I heard was that the passengers brought down the plane. While I know the official explanation sounds a heck of a lot better than the one I heard on the news report, I do find the sort of fishy as well.
I know the official explanation is a lot easier to swallow and personally makes my heart swell with pride, but I'm just not sure I can ever fully believe the official story on that one.
As far as JFK, its already been proven, physically, that one bullet did hit Kennedy through the back and chest, and traveled in a perfect straight line through to Governor Connally.
Connally was sitting much lower than Kennedy in the jump seat, and inches to the inside, because the jump seat had been created and put into the Limo. That's been proven. Connally was also turned to the right, and his body was twisted. That can be seen in the video. Its pretty much been proven that the bullet followed all normal laws of physics.
I don't believe there was a second shooter. Was Oswald the shooter, though? I honestly do not know. There is some evidence the the CIA and the failed Operation 40 guys could have had something to do with it. I also, don't believe Oswald was just some Lone Wolf that killed Kennedy all on his own. There were other things going on than just a Lone Wolf. He may or may not have been the shooter. If he was, I believe there were other people behind it. Other people that pushed him to do it.
Edited for spelling and clarity.