Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,405 Posts
Age discrimination is a must in the film industry.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,593 Posts
It will be interesting to see how that plays out in the courts.
 

·
Seasteading Aficionado
Joined
·
44,900 Posts
But Muh Gubmint!

The most retarded :censored: thing I've ever heard of in my life.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,269 Posts
Good luck enforcing it, especially if it's a site not bound by California jurisdiction, or even U.S. jurisdiction.
 

·
Man of Myth and Legend
Joined
·
15,144 Posts
The whole thing is garbage. Google knows all, from everywhere and you can google stuff even in California. So CA doesn't count.

Nemo
 

·
codegeek reincarnate
Joined
·
901 Posts
Good luck enforcing it, especially if it's a site not bound by California jurisdiction, or even U.S. jurisdiction.
Commiefornia, in its arrogance, believes it can regulate the internet too.

:rotfl:
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Don't tell me you have never looked up the age of an actor or actress. We know you all do it! :)
 

·
Man of Myth and Legend
Joined
·
15,144 Posts
Don't tell me you have never looked up the age of an actor or actress. We know you all do it! :)
I do. I admit it. I am just starting to turn things around and will begin counseling Monday.

Nemo
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
How are you going to get around imdb or wikipedia?
I think it is aimed at imbd. Unless their servers are in California, I have no idea how California thinks it will enforce this.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
It is unclear how the law could be enforced against sites like IMDb, of which the free version of the site would be exempt from the requirement. As Deadline notes, the company could simply cancel the IMDb Pro subscription of those who request their ages be scrubbed from the site, thereby nullifying the requirement to do so.

The law could also face a First Amendment challenge from free speech advocates, many of whom, including Internet Association president and CEO Michael Beckerman, were strongly opposed to the measure.

"Requiring the removal of factually accurate age information across websites suppresses free speech," Beckerman wrote in an op-ed for the Hollywood Reporter last month. "This is not a question of preventing salacious rumors; rather it is about the right to present basic facts that live in the public domain. Displaying such information isn't a form of discrimination, and internet companies should not be punished for how people use public data."

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollyw...ilm-websites-remove-actors-ages-upon-request/
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
69,784 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
More typical was the opinion of one of the country's most prominent First Amendment lawyers, Floyd Abrams of New York's Cahill Gordon & Reindel, who in a half-century of law practice has frequently appeared in the U.S. Supreme Court, including on such notable matters as the Vietnam-era Pentagon Papers case and, more recently (and less beloved by liberals), Citizens United, a case that unleashed a flood of corporate money in politics on free speech grounds.

"The statute seems to me of the most dubious constitutionality," Abrams told THR in an exclusive interview. "Birth dates are facts. It's hard to see how the government, consistently with the First Amendment‎, can bar or punish their disclosure."

. . .

because IMDb and IMDb Pro are effectively the legislation's only target: although the statute's language is general, the Amazon-owned sites seem to be the only services that fall within the law's scope.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-california-imdb-age-law-932808
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,360 Posts
More typical was the opinion of one of the country’s most prominent First Amendment lawyers, Floyd Abrams of New York’s Cahill Gordon & Reindel, who in a half-century of law practice has frequently appeared in the U.S. Supreme Court, including on such notable matters as the Vietnam-era Pentagon Papers case and, more recently (and less beloved by liberals), Citizens United, a case that unleashed a flood of corporate money in politics on free speech grounds.

“The statute seems to me of the most dubious constitutionality,†Abrams told THR in an exclusive interview. “Birth dates are facts. It's hard to see how the government, consistently with the First Amendment‎, can bar or punish their disclosure.â€

. . .

because IMDb and IMDb Pro are effectively the legislation’s only target: although the statute’s language is general, the Amazon-owned sites seem to be the only services that fall within the law’s scope.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-california-imdb-age-law-932808
folks might be surprised just how many web sites are hosted on amazon's portion of the net. e.g. netflix is one.
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Top