Atlanta Botanical Gardens - OC Today

Discussion in 'Citizens Encounters' started by Phil1979, Oct 12, 2014.

  1. phantoms

    phantoms Senior Mumbler

    6,236
    196
    63
    The fact that they applied that as a test of whether public property is private or not as regards to gun laws just goes to show we have a lot of activist judges who will always be biased against guns and allow whatever they can i8nto the argument if it fits their agenda.

    This is what we're up against and will almost always be when it comes to gun laws.
     
  2. ICP_Juggalo

    ICP_Juggalo Professional Troll

    2,068
    54
    48
    Gotta say, the ABG has been a worthy opponent for GCO. After all is said and done, it probably would have been just cheaper for them to acquiescence in allowing people to carry.
     
    Archangel likes this.

  3. Phil1979

    Phil1979 Member Georgia Carry

    11,525
    621
    113
    It was a long wait, but worth it to get some statewide guidance on this from our Ga Supreme Court.

    Now hopefully we'll get the right ruling regarding the Garden's lease type.

    I'm sure this case will eventually become required reading in Georgia's law schools. I'm honored to be part of the Court's case history.
     
  4. awanatech

    awanatech Well-Known Member

    1,354
    175
    63
    Cheaper? Yes, but I suspect it ain't about the money. They can probably easily tap some donors to help cover the expense. It's about the control and their feelings. If they want that level of control, it comes with private property, not public property.
     
    ICP_Juggalo and blksmith like this.
  5. Nemo

    Nemo Man of Myth and Legend

    12,935
    853
    113
    But when its all over they will still know that gun are icky and everyone should keep them away. Despite having to suffer with them nearby.

    Nemo
     
  6. Phil1979

    Phil1979 Member Georgia Carry

    11,525
    621
    113
    rmodel65 likes this.
  7. TimBob

    TimBob Old, Slow, Boring Dude

    2,425
    163
    63
    Well done, John Monroe!
     
    Phil1979 likes this.
  8. Savannah Dan

    Savannah Dan Cross-drawer

    6,993
    273
    83
    That was.........not very thought provoking.
     
  9. Phil1979

    Phil1979 Member Georgia Carry

    11,525
    621
    113
    Atty. John Monroe did a stellar job!
     
    TimBob likes this.
  10. jrm

    jrm Sledgehammer

    4,517
    545
    113
    cases are decided on briefs, not oral arguments. Rarely does anything new come out in oral arguments.
     
  11. Savannah Dan

    Savannah Dan Cross-drawer

    6,993
    273
    83
    And the judge seemed quite impressed with the briefs.
     
  12. ICP_Juggalo

    ICP_Juggalo Professional Troll

    2,068
    54
    48
    JRM, you looked like you were using a green screen behind you. Was that background chroma keyed in?
     
  13. jrm

    jrm Sledgehammer

    4,517
    545
    113
    I'd have to know what means to answer your question.
     
  14. DKW

    DKW Active Member

    444
    49
    28
    Just curious on when we can expect a ruling in this case?
     
  15. jrm

    jrm Sledgehammer

    4,517
    545
    113
    Any day now.
     
    Savannah Dan likes this.
  16. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    67,152
    1,470
    113
  17. Malum Prohibitum

    Malum Prohibitum Moderator Staff Member

    67,152
    1,470
    113
  18. jrm

    jrm Sledgehammer

    4,517
    545
    113
    Oh, I thought someone would have posted by now -- the court ruled in the garden's favor. No discussion of the tax issue at all. Notice of appeal has been filed.
     
  19. Clark

    Clark Well-Known Member

    1,027
    88
    48
    :censored: HOW??? What idiotic justification did their paid-off shill sitting on some over-priced bench claim this time!?!?!?
     
    TimBob likes this.