Just to clarify, both parties have moved for summary judgment. The links are to the briefs for each party. So the Garden is saying that it wins as a matter of law because the lease grants an estate for years. GCO is saying it wins as a matter of law because the lease grants a usufruct. Each side will respond to the other side within 30 days. Then the filer of the original brief files a reply even though there is no authority in Georgia law to do so, just because everybody does it anyway without any authority to do so.