Georgia Firearm Forums - Georgia Packing banner

The Socialist Takeover and Upcoming Crime Wave

5K views 52 replies 19 participants last post by  diamondback 
#1 ·
Who wants to bet in 10 years the socialists want capitalism again!!!
 
#5 ·
You can vote yourself into socialism, but it will take guns to get you out of socialism...
 
#7 ·
Just ask Venezuela how socialism has worked for the Venezuelan people since 1998.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil1979
#12 ·
in my opinion, I believe it is the establishment, I believe there are those on both side who advocate policy that create it, AOC lol Bernie. most democrats these days are advocates for government control or there would be no reason to oppose firearms, it isn't our live they're worried about, obviously, the democrat cities prove that, the voting kids, they vote for free iPhones and college lol
 
#16 ·
With all that has been posted above, and I am NOT naming the post above this one, but I get the impression that folks that are gullible enough to put faith in Google, Facebook, Apple, et all, will really be gullible enough to keep believing in such entities, (after already giving tons of money to such organizations, either directly or indirectly). Giving quarter to the enemy. Supporting your opponent. But they will. Because they have been lulled into such. Bless their hearts - they just don't know any better. I feel sorry for them, in a way. But I also loathe them. Because they are giving money to those who put us there. I won't call them idiots. I will just call them ignorant. If only they would open their minds and do a little research...
 
#20 ·
A reasonable response. I get tripped up when comparing a politicians words to his/her actions. This country is where it is due to the lies and corruption from many people. Any one particular ideology has it's share of sins. A blended approach will probably yield the best results.
 
#24 ·
dhaller is more eloquent than me. But it doesn't require eloquence to notice problems in all ideologies, forms of government, or any other creations of man. Do we deal with problems with open minds? Or shut off possible solutions because of rigid, inaccurate views? Social programs such as those used in countries with higher "quality of life" than America, may illustrate some possible solutions.
 
#26 ·
I have no problem with social programs to help the truly needy in our society. What i have a problem with is helping the ones that won't help themselves.

What really gets me is seeing someone in line at the grocery story wearing $200 pair of Nikes, having the latest Iphone and then seeing them take there stuff to a car that is nicer than mine using those food stamp cards for food.

OR someone claiming a disability in order to not work which most self respecting adults would just deal with it.

that is the stuff that pisses me off and why we have a $27T deficient. And the progressives want more of that shit.
 
#27 ·
that is the stuff that pisses me off and why we have a $27T deficient. And the progressives want more of that ****.
That's also because we give out billions of dollars to other countries. No other nation on earth comes close to the amount of taxpayer money we send overseas. That has got to stop, this does not benefit Americans.
 
#30 ·
Helping other countries with acts or infrastructure upgrade can have benefits for the United States, in that stability achieved overseas can create more chances for peace. The greatest $ outlay for our foreign policy are arms sales. Try to convince a Republican that it's a good idea to limit that.
 
#33 ·
I wouldn't say all foreign spending is wasteful, but if you've seen the US government spend money you know that fraud, waste, and abuse are rampant. I would bet that more than half of our foreign spending could be characterized as wasteful. Just one example from the recent bill is the millions of dollars for gender studies in Pakistan. That will in no way benefit Americans, and I highly doubt that a single dime of that will actually be spent as intended.
 
#37 ·
I would argue the exact opposite of dhaller. Health care is so important that it cannot be trusted to government to deliver. The free enterprise system delivers more and better goods and services to more people than any other system in history, regardless of what types of goods and services we are talking about. The more that government force distorts this system, the less effective it is. Socialism is the very definition of government forcibly distorting the free market. By definition, it cannot deliver anything but shortages and rationing. Any system, physical, economic, etc. must have a control system that takes into account feedback from the system being controlled. Our bodies have pain receptors to keep us from damaging them excessively. Industrial processes have a PID loop to provide control and stability so systems work as desired. Socialism's feedback is intentionally disconnected from those both creating and receiving goods and services, with predictably disastrous results. Most of our current woes with the health care delivery and funding systems are due to government forcibly disconnecting the providers and the consumers.
 
#38 ·
So I subscribe to a theory that we’re ultimately moving towards a closed system. We’re really already there, but we have some buffers that deprive us of the sense of urgency immediacy that will be needed one day. Talking about it with respect to the globe is too big for viable conversion. The state of Georgia is too big for that as well. Heck, even the Atlanta metro is too big, so the best I can do is a hypothetical.

The hypothetical is this: Put 10,000 people on a large space ship and point them at a nearby star. It’ll be a 300 year journey. Plan a functional government and constitution that suits the needs of The People so that 12 generations later there are still individual rights but equally food is still being grown, waste is reprocessed, reactor maintenance occurs, and the population remains healthy and stable (also in a genetic sense).

Now bridge the gap from where we are now to that sort of society. No, we won’t need a superbly managed genetic plan and we won’t have constraints so tight as “if one of these teens doesn’t grow up to be an air handler engineer then we all die” but we will eventually face a degree of resource limitations that we’re not so good at handling today. I suspect we’ll see changes similar to when nomadic herdsmen displaced hunter-gatherers and then when agrarian economies displaced nomadic herdsmen and again when industrialized economies displaced agrarian ones. There are distinctly different societal norms for each as well as distinctly different “most optimal” governments for each. I posit that we’re in the throes of crossing a threshold where it all changes again.
 
#51 · (Edited)
Biden will welcome them with open arms across the open borders and will take the money that he, by threat of severe negative repercussions, forcefully took from hard working American taxpayers and will give them health care, education, food, shelter, etc., etc., etc.,. I do not think there is going to be a recovery from the damage that has been done, will be done and has been peacefully allowed. The trajectory is unsustainable. God forgive and bless these once great US of A New Migrant Caravan Forms In Honduras Looking To Make The 'Deadly Journey' To The United States | The Daily Wire and

Big Business: Joe Biden's Amnesty for Illegal Aliens Is a Legislative Priority (breitbart.com)
 
#53 ·
not without a revolutionary or civil war. Many northern friends remind me the south lost. I inform them not only would many union officers surrender their arms if they saw what was to come but lee would not have surrendered. Remember vietnam the usa simply was wore down.

I hope it never comes to that but many Americans do love our nation and do not want to see it sold out for a bowl of spicy chili
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harhib
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top